July 11, 20232 yr 15 minutes ago, tup61 said: Come to think of it... I do suppose you are an associate of PF3 then? Because you do the exact same whenever ATC is being talked about. I can't remember a topic about FSHud in which you did NOT felt the need to say the FSHud voices are awful and how much you prefer PF3. Just teasing you a little bit, Bob. 😉 Been using PF3 for around a decade. Prior to that I was a beta tester for two other ATC programs. When something works well, I use it till I find something that works better. So far, the best thing I have seen, is Beyond ATC, but until that is released and working well, I am happy with what I have. I do about 12-15- IFR flights a week, and all with zero ATC problems.
July 11, 20232 yr 19 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: Been using PF3 for around a decade. Prior to that I was a beta tester for two other ATC programs. When something works well, I use it till I find something that works better. So far, the best thing I have seen, is Beyond ATC, but until that is released and working well, I am happy with what I have. I do about 12-15- IFR flights a week, and all with zero ATC problems. How can you say something works well if you have never tried either BeyondAtc or FSHud? The same thing I say to my children when they don't want to eat a vegetable, also to my wife and she also does not want to try everything.
July 11, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, rob0203 said: How can you say something works well if you have never tried either BeyondAtc or FSHud? What a ridiculous statement. I flew a Cessna 172 for years, and it worked very well on every flight. Because I didn't try another model of aircraft, I shouldn't say that?. How absurd.
July 11, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Bobsk8 said: What a ridiculous statement. I flew a Cessna 172 for years, and it worked very well on every flight. Because I didn't try another model of aircraft, I shouldn't say that?. How absurd. I don’t think it is a ridulous statement. It is really weird if somebody writes a review about software they never used? I think that is quite ridiculous….
July 11, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, rob0203 said: I don’t think it is a ridulous statement. It is really weird if somebody writes a review about software they never used? I think that is quite ridiculous…. Point out where I wrote a review, ( with a link). All I have said in posts was I watched a couple of videos, and I thought the voices were horrible. I don't need to purchase the program to figure that out. Why are you making a false accusation , accusing me of "writing a review"?
July 11, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: Point out where I wrote a review, ( with a link). All I have said in posts was I watched a couple of videos, and I thought the voices were horrible. I don't need to purchase the program to figure that out. Why are you making a false accusation , accusing me of "writing a review"? What I mean whenever Fshud is mentioned you have a very strong negative opinion but you don’t even own the program.
July 11, 20232 yr 6 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: All I have said in posts was I watched a couple of videos, and I thought the voices were horrible. Have to say, I agree with Bob. This is an audio utility, and the voices sound awful
July 11, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, rob0203 said: What I mean whenever Fshud is mentioned you have a very strong negative opinion but you don’t even own the program. If you think it is great, post a video with voices that sound half way decent, at least. Hey I have an even better idea, how about a free demo, like other ATC programs offer. Edited July 11, 20232 yr by Bobsk8
July 11, 20232 yr 3 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: If you think it is great, post a video with voices that sound half way decent, at least. Hey I have an even better idea, how about a free demo, like other ATC programs offer. Bob, have you tried VATSIM? The voices are really good - and regional based.
July 11, 20232 yr 6 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: If you think it is great, post a video with voices that sound half way decent, at least. Hey I have an even better idea, how about a free demo, like other ATC programs offer. To be honoust the first time I bought FSHud I did not like it and requested a refund. Then after a while I bought it again because of my curiousity with ATC products and wanted to see how it developed, so you could try it if you really want!
July 11, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, ErichB said: Bob, have you tried VATSIM? The voices are really good - and regional based. Yes, I flew Vatsim for years, a long time ago. I found after awhile, that flying in different countries and regions, and different times of the day, and finding controllers just became way to complicated. Take this morning, I am on my second flight in the US, one in California Coast , and the second on the East coast into KFLL. Controller on line in either of those places, zero.
July 11, 20232 yr 2 minutes ago, rob0203 said: To be honoust the first time I bought FSHud I did not like it and requested a refund. Then after a while I bought it again because of my curiousity with ATC products and wanted to see how it developed, so you could try it if you really want! I don't like Liver. So you are saying if I buy liver a couple of times, I might get to like it? 🤪
July 11, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Bobsk8 said: I don't like Liver. So you are saying if I buy liver a couple of times, I might get to like it? 🤪 I don't know but I hope my 5 year old sun is going to eat vegetables someday 🙃
July 11, 20232 yr All the ATC programs look like they might solve some of the issues I have with the defualt ATC, but frustrate me in other ways. I'll have spend the money to be frustrated, too. That said, with how FSHUD manageds injected traffic, it's a candidate.
July 11, 20232 yr 2 minutes ago, rob0203 said: I don't know but I hope my 5 year old sun is going to eat vegetables someday TBH my grandmother said the same thing about me, and I remain a strict carnivore.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.