No turbulence in flight

[KERNEL32 510]

1 hour ago, Ixoye said:

I have had a lot of turbulence on my recent flights with the A2A Comanche, I also use FS Realistic and haven't noticed any reduction in that effect over time, quite the opposite since I started flying the Comanche.

That is because the plane has "built in" turbulence enhancement..

[environmental_ice 242]

People saying they have plenty of turbulence.....while using FS Realistic 😑 the bumps disappear once I change to a wing view compared to the flight deck

[Tuskin38 6,635]

Yeah, flying through Hurricane Norma in the A320, no turbulence, just bad winds.

[StoneDoor 90]

54 minutes ago, environmental_ice said:

People saying they have plenty of turbulence.....while using FS Realistic 😑 the bumps disappear once I change to a wing view compared to the flight deck

FS Realistic does not cause turbulence (except optional low altitude turbulence). It makes turbulence more visible.

[environmental_ice 242]

4 minutes ago, StoneDoor said:

FS Realistic does not cause turbulence (except optional low altitude turbulence). It makes turbulence more visible.

Im aware. Which is why Im laughing at people who think they have turbulence while running that addon

[StoneDoor 90]

2 minutes ago, environmental_ice said:

Im aware. Which is why Im laughing at people who think they have turbulence while running that addon

I'm laughing because you don't understand what FS Realistic does.

If you have turbulence using that add-on, you have turbulence without it.

[environmental_ice 242]

5 minutes ago, StoneDoor said:

I'm laughing because you don't understand what FS Realistic does.

If you have turbulence using that add-on, you have turbulence without it.

I do understand what it does. Its nothing more than a camera shaker. Maybe you need to re read my sarcasm in my initial comment instead of trying to educate me on FS Realistic. 

Edited October 21, 2023 by environmental_ice

[StoneDoor 90]

2 minutes ago, environmental_ice said:

I do understand what it does. Maybe you need to re read my sarcasm in my initial comment instead of trying to educate me on FS Realistic. 

I see a wrong statement. No sarcasm.

[environmental_ice 242]

Just now, StoneDoor said:

I see a wrong statement. No sarcasm.

Nah you just didnt get it and thats fine. The fact you think that I think FS Realistic causes turbulence is clear to me you didnt get my sarcasm. Have a great day lol

[StoneDoor 90]

1 minute ago, environmental_ice said:

Nah you just didnt get it and thats fine. The fact you think that I think FS Realistic causes turbulence is clear to me you didnt get my sarcasm. Have a great day lol

I think you don't know what sarcasm is. Either.

[environmental_ice 242]

2 minutes ago, StoneDoor said:

I think you don't know what sarcasm is. Either.

Oh really?.... 'Sarcasm refers to the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say'

 

In other words if you were to take something literally as you did complexly missing my sarcasm it can easily be said that my statement was wrong however Ive already let you know I dont think FS Realistic causes turbulence. The sarcasm is how other people either think it does or forget its running in the background and therefore think turbulence in MSFS is working. Im not really sure what you are trying to do here. You didnt get the sarcasm so just move on 

[StoneDoor 90]

2 minutes ago, environmental_ice said:

Oh really?.... 'Sarcasm refers to the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say'

Way too simplistic. Bye!

[Ixoye 1,837]

1 hour ago, environmental_ice said:

Im aware. Which is why Im laughing at people who think they have turbulence while running that addon

Why do you laugh at others just because they don't know, what's funny about that?

Edited October 21, 2023 by Ixoye

[El Diablito 330]

I had a bit of turbulence on a moonlit night into Osaka yesterday evening. Whether it was the "extra shaking" from FSR or from the sim I could not give the slightest. It was turbulence. 

[environmental_ice 242]

46 minutes ago, Ixoye said:

Why do you laugh at others just because they don't know, what's funny about that?

Its one thing to harmlessly not know but its another thing entirely to have a concrete opinion about turbulence in the sim that is completely wrong. The latter is what I find comical. To those I ask are we flying the same simulator because other than FS Realistic camera shaking from the flightdeck only, turbulence is basically non existent. You would think this would be talked about more considering the appeal for cabins to "walk" around in yet when  you look out the window the plane is flying on rails even while flying through towering cumulus clouds.