Thomas Rasmussen is back with another master piece video featuring the Flight Factor Boeing 777.

 

Looks good, but not for me.

1 hour ago, efis007 said:

Looks good, but not for me.

Now I'm curious about why not for you? 

It wasn't a criticism of the product.
Long-haul aircraft A380, 777, 747, MD11, etc., don't particularly appeal to me.
There are some pilots who buy long-haul aircraft and then use them on short-haul routes, or fly long-haul flights using time compression, turning those flights into short-haul simulations.
Of course, every virtual pilot has the privilege of simulating as they prefer.
I also used time compression years ago with FS9 and PMDG 747 aircraft.
Initially I liked it, but then I realized that that type of flight wasn't what I wanted.
Using these large liners to simulate short-duration "A319" flights, or long-duration (with time compression) flights, didn't satisfy me anymore, and so I made a rule for myself to only use aircraft that satisfied my way of flying, which consists of flying real routes that vary from 30 minutes to 2 hours.
The planes that work well for my needs are the more conventional Toliss A3xx, Rotate MD80, and occasionally the 737 Zibo.
Toliss for example will soon be coming out with the A330, which is also a long-range plane, and although I have a lot of faith in Toliss I probably won't buy it because the A3xx series is sufficient for my short and medium-range flights.

This is another one I may need to splurge on. I have all the Boeings in XP12 except 777 and 787. I have the PMDG one for MSFS, but if I feel like flying XP, I need to have your main workhorses - the current Boeing and Airbus fleet. So, yes... another investment, but it's a good one. This kind of goes against my initial vision of no "overlaps" between MSFS and XP12, but I couldn't resist having both ToLiss and Fenix A32x series, and the Zibo is always as much fun as the PMDG 737 (to be honest, I actually enjoy it a little more due to better flight dynamics and XP's advantage in ground handling)... This looks beautiful and even better than the other FF Boeings. 

19 hours ago, efis007 said:

Using these large liners to simulate short-duration "A319" flights, or long-duration (with time compression) flights, didn't satisfy me anymore, and so I made a rule for myself to only use aircraft that satisfied my way of flying, which consists of flying real routes that vary from 30 minutes to 2 hours.

Freighter 777s fly some routes that would fit that bill, but the required add-on variant for the base aircraft may not materialize for a while.

I have bought it, personally I don't care about flying real routes I am looking for something else in a simulated procedures and sensations but I understand that not everyone is looking for the same thing.