Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
virtualstuff

care for some WAAS approaches? (pics)

Recommended Posts

Guest SkullxBones

But will it actually capture the glideslope? The reason I ask is because RealityXP already has an excellent WAAS GPS that can be installed in any plane, but you can't capture the glideslope due to FSX's peculiarities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>But will it actually capture the glideslope? The reason I ask>is because RealityXP already has an excellent WAAS GPS that>can be installed in any plane, but you can't capture the>glideslope due to FSX's peculiarities. Absolutely the AP can capture the GP (Glide Path) And it does not rely on the Garmin trainer either. Stay tuned on the Mustang site for some more pictures in the next few days showing just that.Jim Rhoads

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>is because RealityXP already has an excellent WAAS GPS that>can be installed in any plane, but you can't capture the>glideslope due to FSX's peculiarities. That's not too cozy because without ability to capture the glideslope you effectively don't have WAAS, at least you are missing its key features.Michael J.http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9320/apollo17vf7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>>is because RealityXP already has an excellent WAAS GPS that>>can be installed in any plane, but you can't capture the>>glideslope due to FSX's peculiarities. >>That's not too cozy because without ability to capture the>glideslope you effectively don't have WAAS, at least you are>missing its key features.>>Michael J.>http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9320/apollo17vf7.jpgWhoa there, I'm not sure I agree with your assertion. Just because you can't fly a WAAS approach hands-off doesn't mean that a non-coupled, hand-flown ability to get into an airport that would otherwise (pre-WAAS) be off the menu is not worth something. There are many airplanes out there (in RL) that have a GPS that can do WAAS (typically, an upgraded Garmin GNS430 or 530), that is not hooked up to the autopilot (typically, because of cost). But, the pilot can still "get into" an airport that has a WAAS approach, with minimums that are below what that airport previously offered with VOR/etc. approaches.This is not to say that I'm annoyed that I can't fly coupled approaches with the RXPx30W products - but I can still use WAAS to my advantage.Dave B.


System: Asus P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 mobo *** i7 2700K @ 5gHz w/ Corsair H80 cooler

NVidia GTX 570 OC *** 8 GB 1600 Corsair Vengeance DRAM *** CoolerMaster HAF X case

System overclocked and tuned for FSX by fs-gs.com

Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog stick/throttle & CH Products Pro Pedals

Various GoFlight panels *** PFC avionics stack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seldom fly coupled approaches anyway-they are boring.Maybe why I never noticed a problem with the Reality xp product?-I haven't really kept up but never noticed a problem.However, the above product looks great. I flew a Columbia 400 with a g1000 a few weeks ago-my first experience with the g1000. If the above product duplicates it which it appears it does I will be in hog heaven along with many others that I know are waiting for this.GeofaMy blog:http://geofageofa.spaces.live.com/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Whoa there, I'm not sure I agree with your assertion. Just>because you can't fly a WAAS approach hands-off doesn't mean>that a non-coupled, hand-flown ability to get into an airport>that would otherwise (pre-WAAS) be off the menu is not worth>something. That is true, but his mentioning of "coupled" could mean something yet different. For example if AP can't be coupled does it mean at least I get correct FD cues? In other words could FD be coupled? If not it would be rather disappointing in some high end GA airplane with Flight Director capability, then you are left with flying raw signal which is of course possible but not what folks in some Cessna 210 or a Malibu typically crave to do.By the way, pour yourself a glass of wine and watch this video (not WAAS related) ...http://mustang.flight1.net/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=55Michael J.http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9320/apollo17vf7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest SkullxBones

That does look nice, but on my video player there is a lot of shimmer around the gauges. Does it shimmer like that in the game? Any know if GPS will have current DEP/ARV procedures and the ability to update them?Also would be curious to know how flight plans will be loaded. Can you pre-load them or will we have to enter each one manually?I not a big fan of small biz jets but I might have to make an exception here if a lot of the systems are modeled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the shimmer is not the same in-game. The video actually amplifies it some. I will check the Codec settings to see if better filters can be applied.


Thanks,

 

Steve Halpern

Flight One Software

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>However, the above product looks great. I flew a Columbia 400>with a g1000 a few weeks ago-my first experience with the>g1000. If the above product duplicates it which it appears it>does I will be in hog heaven along with many others that I>know are waiting for this.Hi Geof,"Duplicate" is a strong word for anything that is simulated.Replicate might be a bit more appropriate and realistic in simulation terms. Also keep in mind the G1000 in the Mustang is specific to it with features that will not be found in other G1000 units.Regards,Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did I see a mic cable or something that looked like a curly mic cable moving to the right of the pedestal, as if to swing a little?


- Chris

Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX | Intel Core i9 13900KF | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB | 64GB DDR5 SDRAM | Corsair H100i Elite 240mm Liquid Cooling | 1TB & 2TB Samsung Gen 4 SSD  | 1000 Watt Gold PSU |  Windows 11 Pro | Thrustmaster Boeing Yoke | Thrustmaster TCA Captain X Airbus | Asus ROG 38" 4k IPS Monitor (PG38UQ)

Asus Maximus VII Hero motherboard | Intel i7 4790k CPU | MSI GTX 970 4 GB video card | Corsair DDR3 2133 32GB SDRAM | Corsair H50 water cooler | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD (2) | EVGA 1000 watt PSU - Retired

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>I seldom fly coupled approaches anyway-they are boring.>>Maybe why I never noticed a problem with the Reality xp>product?-I haven't really kept up but never noticed a>problem.>>However, the above product looks great. I flew a Columbia 400>with a g1000 a few weeks ago-my first experience with the>g1000. If the above product duplicates it which it appears it>does I will be in hog heaven along with many others that I>know are waiting for this.>>>Geofa>My blog:>http://geofageofa.spaces.live.com/Yep sometimes in our community some of those beautifull aircraft comes along with the attention of those little details on all fields!I'm for sure Flight one will set the benchmark very high.The first aircraft in a long time that really gives that special excitement of an upcoming release...Great stuff.http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y156/awf1/sign.jpg


 

André
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...