jrhoads

This is not accurate. Sorry, no patch has been released yet.

Thank you Bill, You are correct. If you come into our forums with a civil tone and request, you will be greeted in kind. However, if you enter kicking the door open, you will be not so kindly escorted off premises. Read between the lines.... Best Regards,

Hi Bill, you can contact me directly and I will assist you with an SDK Jim

Hi Tim, A2A has contacted us and we will be assisting them with VC integration in the very near future. Regards Jim

Not true. It is update-able. You have to do what they do in the real world... buy it from garmin.

I am not going anywhere with it. It was just a simple question based on your comment about us using a non default display. Either yours is default based or it isn't. You made two assertions on how we do things and since at least one was incorrect, I just wanted to clarify that. Thats all. However you are correct, there is no default based variable that calls a Glide Path (Glide slope is ILS based) But then again, FS or P3D has never given us everything we need. So we figure out how to do it ourselves.

Are you implying yours is? Not being smart, just asking for clarity sake. Jim

Actually, that is not correct. In those two named products we do indeed use the default FS Autopilot as the AP engine. We do some thinking outside of the box to get things done, but the AP engine is the FSX AP. Regards Jim

Those sounds are from Turbine Sound Studios. First time I have ever heard that about their work. And no one has mentioned anything about brake sensitivity to the extreme you are implying. Sorry you feel the way you do but my guess is this there is something in the loop you have not shared with us as we are very attentive to customer concerns and problems and these two you mention are not something we are hearing from anyone else.

Patience....... B)

And a new lower price of $39.95 fixed. Competition is a wonderful thing for the consumer. Jim

Welcome to the world of multiple glass displays and FSX. Its a pretty simple concept that seems to elude many... the more you draw, the more it costs. If you want great glass displays in FSX, it doesnt matter if your model is a pogo stick with wings. It is going to cost frames and it is up to the user to back off other settings to make it reasonable. Jim

Ok lets look further. You buy it from us. You want to sell it. EU law says you can do that. OK, so you can. But we will not support it because you are not the original purchaser and support does indeed cost us time and money and we pay people to do support. So what do we do? We lock the support forums down so that only an original purchaser can get support. Which is what has been happening as of late because there is a significant amount of people that pirate the software and come into our forums asking for help. Yes it costs us money. So we will have to apply the same logic to a "second party" sold product. You may sell the software, but we get nothing out of that sale to cover support. This whole ruling only makes it tougher for the end user, not easier. Because we and many others will cover our bases as a result.

Just looking at the obvious Tom. Been around here a long time and its a pattern I recognize. Thanks for staying on top of it.

Sorry. EU law doesnt trump US law unless it is international. This thread is not going to anyone any good and personally, it should not be left to stand. This is nothing but a powder keg that no one will win over.