November 30, 2025Nov 30 35 minutes ago, Farlis said: I also think it is reasonable to expect this if the thread is not longer than two pages and something like 3 dozen posts. If it gets longer I think it can be excused if people do not read it all. Agreed, I don't expect someone to read a 34 page thread. Once it's longer than a few pages it's "typically" just people arguing the same thing back and forth anyway LOL Have a Wonderful Day -Paul Solk
November 30, 2025Nov 30 2 hours ago, psolk said: 100% this! So frustrating (to me at least) when someone just repeats what has already been said 7 times. It happens all the time that someone posts something and then 7 other people come and post the EXACT same thing. Is it really that hard to "read" the thread before posting? OK, Sunday morning rant over LOL Have a good day everyone. @BWBriscoe I think it may be rudder related 😉 Who are you - the AVSIM police? If you don't care for another poster's comments just move on.
November 30, 2025Nov 30 23 minutes ago, dbw1 said: Who are you - the AVSIM police? If you don't care for another poster's comments just move on. Seriously? Did I tell anyone to stop? Did I even ask anyone to stop? I lightheartedly pointed out something that to quote Peter Griffin "grinds my gears" I also made a point to comment that I was only speaking for myself hence the (to me at least) that was specifically emphasized. How Ironic you post explicitly to chastise me when your own post says 23 minutes ago, dbw1 said: If you don't care for another poster's comments just move on. So maybe practice what you preach? My goodness, it was supposed to be light hearted commentary and I acknowledged a "personal rant" on 6 people saying the same thing one after another but I guess you couldn't just ignore it or "move on" but instead had to be your own Avsim Police and lecture me? 🤔 If you want to lecture people start with practicing what you preach. Edited November 30, 2025Nov 30 by psolk Have a Wonderful Day -Paul Solk
November 30, 2025Nov 30 Bear in mind that MSFS (both version) sometimes does not reset trim values, between flights. So you can be flying a PA28, with a decent amount of rudder trim in, then your next flight might be the A320 and the flight can load (not always it seems) with the deflected rudder trim stil insitu. It's caught me out a few times. I've not analysed this heavily, but I think it may occur when you load a subsequent, second flight in the same sim session. If you restart the sim, I don't believe this problem occurs. It last happened to me after flying the SWS PC-12 - which required a 3 degree rudder trimming to the right for take-off. I then loaded another flight with the BR Designs Grumman Tiger and the rudder trim was still offset. Perhaps this is what happened to our cheerful friend with his A350. Edited November 30, 2025Nov 30 by JYW Bill 😎FS2024 • Currently in 'GA mode' : A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • Black Square C208, Bonanzas, Barons, TBM850, Dukes • COWS DA40 & DA42 • FSW Legacy, C24R Sierra & C414 • Echo Falco F8L • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • Got Friends A32 Vixxen • FSReborn Sirius TL3000, Sting S4 and Piper M500 • Flyboy Rans S6S • Skyward DA50RG • SWS Zenith CH701, RV-8, RV-10, RV-14, PC12 • Milviz C310R • Air Foil Labs Bristell B23 TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000NPPL licence holder in the UK
November 30, 2025Nov 30 What shouldn’t be tolerated is the OP slagging off a developer's product, when it seems most likely that the LNAV issue is either a result of operator error, a hardware/ binding error or an inadvertent control input. Surely he did more than this one flight to reproduce this behaviour? Cheers Steve Hall
November 30, 2025Nov 30 You know I’ve been flying this plane since release and I have had none of these problems whatsoever… the plane is amazing (well it is for me) sorry to hear people are having issues with it Regards Paul EGCC
December 1, 2025Dec 1 On 11/30/2025 at 1:03 PM, cowpatz said: What shouldn’t be tolerated is the OP slagging off a developer's product, when it seems most likely that the LNAV issue is either a result of operator error, a hardware/ binding error or an inadvertent control input. Surely he did more than this one flight to reproduce this behaviour? Perhaps it’s the op’s MO as the name comes up often after operator errors. R9-9950X3D 32G | RTX5090 | 3T m.2 | Win11 | vkb-gf ultimate & pedals | virpil cm3 throttle | tm boeing yoke | pimax super uw | DCS
Create an account or sign in to comment