Jump to content

kdfw__

Members
  • Content Count

    1,181
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

533 Excellent

1 Follower

About kdfw__

  • Rank
    Member - 1,000+

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

7,305 profile views
  1. This must be the place where the rf legs troll bots, pmdg troll bots, and cartoon texture bots come to dump their payloads. happens Every. Single. Time.
  2. Dallas pg has always been bad. Best to look elsewhere for better pg quality. Regardless, doesn’t look nice in real life either.
  3. Seems there’s an unhealthy compulsion to stalk a guy who posts yt vids. Don’t know what’s up with past history to make this a personal thingy, but honestly, it’s weird.
  4. just because of this thread i hope fsr3 will not happen.
  5. nice explanation of the iae power plant's gauges using the b2.
  6. didn't rename profile but otherwise it's working fine on msfs store version. btw, had couple of weird runaway tlod sessions on the auto tlod version v0.4 where tlod kept going up even as fps crashed. happened on 2nd flight in the sessions, didn't happen immediately after flying. it's a vr setup with fps locked at 30, target set to 28 to give it a chance to increase tlod. regardless, on my setup don't think it's powerful enough to chase fps with tlod. the reset edition seems the best for it.
  7. nice aircraft but i'm waiting for the f100. and also for the rj100.
  8. tried both the reset edition and the autofps versions and for my setup (vr, modest hw), chasing fps with the autofps version doesn't run as smooth as the reset edition. at least for my setup, fps isn't a good proxy for performance (smoothness). the original premise of dynamic tlod was to decrease tlod close to the ground for improved performance (smoothness) and as altitude increased, freed up hw resources could be used towards loading a larger tlod radius. the reset edition does this well.
  9. looks like a good model. but seems too much like the default da62 which is pretty nice with the same wt g1000.
  10. umm, no. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/microsoft-is-discontinuing-windows-mixed-reality-wmr/622334/185 https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/microsoft-is-discontinuing-windows-mixed-reality-wmr/622334/191
  11. msfs store version readback=1.36.2.0
  12. Best you should go to the pmdg forum to directly ask the dev’s flying cred if so concerned about it, instead of taking pot shot posts here at avsim. Go to the source, i say. don’t have any idea of your flying cred (and don’t care), but once you start questioning others, you shine a spotlight on yourself. And all this drama over a $70 make-believe airplane model?
  13. You realize this is just a $70 desktop “simulator” for entertainment purposes? don’t get the constant obsession from “type rated” dudes harping on this in posts after posts on avsim. Best to go to the devs forum or use their tix to lodge a formal complaint, more likely to get a better outcome than complaining about it here. ——————— Separately, that post asking about rf legs for 737 in a 777 update… that was akin to trolling. Which predictably resulted in drama here and elsewhere with this usual characters venting their creepy personal grievance against the dev.
  14. <sigh> still the milky white side windows at night...
  15. Obviously we have those who track ytubers and hold unnatural grudges against them. Creepy.
×
×
  • Create New...