April 29Apr 29 13 hours ago, ConstVoid said: Well, not exactly, but at the moment if you want live traffic your options are fairly limited, such as MSFS's own live traffic. or PSXT
April 29Apr 29 3 hours ago, kiek said: or PSXT No - because @jwhak was asking explicitly about live traffic with FSHud, which means that PSXT is a non-starter. I don't think I need to re-iterate why. Ian Box
April 29Apr 29 Is MSFS live traffic improving and are there active plans to further develop model matching etc.? It seems like maybe a viable option but lots of incorrectly displayed models and livieries even though I have AIG fully installed. Some airports are not bad but it's still very inaccurate. Or is this whole area basically dead in the water and ASOBO isn't interested? AMD 5830X Nvidia RTX 3060 Win 11
April 29Apr 29 From what I’ve seen, default MSFS live traffic is still the weak link if accurate model matching matters to you. It can look decent at some airports, but once you know the airlines and routes the wrong models and liveries still stand out pretty quickly, even with AIG installed. Personally I treat it more as a fallback than something I’d build my whole traffic setup around. If visual live traffic is the main goal, PSXT still makes more sense to me. If the priority is having ATC actually manage the traffic picture, I still end up preferring AIG flightplans and models with FSHud instead.
April 29Apr 29 May be fstl guys can contact ads-exchange to get ads-b api free or for a fees lesser than fr24 and charge customers a small fees to get the live ads-b traffic. Hope ms/asobo gets some good love feed to inject into their Sim. With the current default live feed very little traffic is seen.
April 29Apr 29 1 hour ago, LineDX said: May be fstl guys can contact ads-exchange to get ads-b api free or for a fees lesser than fr24 and charge customers a small fees to get the live ads-b traffic. That where 👍 😍 cheers 😉 08.2024 new PC is online : ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Mainboard, AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D Prozessor, G.Skill DIMM 64 GB DDR5-6000 (2x 32 GB) Dual-Kit, MSI GeForce RTX 4090 VENTUS 3X E 24G OC Grafikkarte, 2x WD Black SN850X NVMe SSD 4 TB - Drive C+D, WD Gold Enterprise Class 12 TB for storage HDD, Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1000W PC - Power supply, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Aircooler with 7 Heatpipes, Design Meshify 2 White TG Clear Tint Tower-Case, 3x 4K monitors 2x32 Samsung 1x27 LG 3840x2160, Windows11 Prof. 23H2 - now Windows11 Prof. 25H2 Flightsimulator Hardware: Honeycomb Throttle Bravo, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro, Logitech Flight Joke System, XBox Controller, some Thrustmaster stuff, Winwing CDU Panels.
April 30Apr 30 For me the default MSFS live traffic still feels like a compromise rather than a real solution if model matching matters to you. At some larger airports it can look decent at first glance, but once you know the routes and airline mix the wrong types and liveries start to stand out pretty quickly. I have not seen enough movement yet to trust that Asobo is going to turn it into a really accurate traffic layer in the near term. If your main goal is visual live traffic, I would still look at PSXT first. If the goal is having AI traffic that an ATC add-on can manage more coherently, I still get better results from scheduled models and flightplans than from the default live feed.
Create an account or sign in to comment