May 15May 15 1 hour ago, Ricardo41 said:Where is it?The first post says "in the next few days".Yep same here, hope it comes this Weekend. Cant wait to test this Feature.
May 17May 17 Been using FSHud ATC pretty much exclusively lately, does everything I need it to do, only real gripe that somewhat grinds my gears is entering SYD airspace, all controllers and pilots have an american accent, and QANTAS is being pronounced CANDICE, really throws immersion for a loop. Other than little things like that, it goes pretty good. i9-13900K | 6400MHz DDR5 (32GB) | GeForce RTX 4090 24GB MSFS 2024 | PMDG 777-300ER | FBW A380X | Fenix A320 | ini A350
May 17May 17 Same here on the immersion side. I can live with a generic accent a lot easier than a broken callsign, and QANTAS turning into CANDICE would definitely pull me out of it too. For me the actual vectoring and traffic handling still matter more overall, but better regional pronunciation would make the whole thing feel much more convincing.
May 23May 23 Been using FSHud ATC pretty much exclusively lately, does everything I need it to do, only real gripe that somewhat grinds my gears is entering SYD airspace, all controllers and pilots have an american accent, and QANTAS is being pronounced CANDICE, really throws immersion for a loop.Other than little things like that, it goes pretty good.This. Also Air France has been both spelt and pronounced as "Air Frans" in the app seemingly since day one.
May 23May 23 For me the bigger immersion breaker is when the callsign pronunciation is wrong but the traffic logic is otherwise doing the right thing. I can forgive a generic accent much easier than hearing Air France or Qantas mangled while I am trying to follow a busy arrival. That said, I still care more about good sequencing, spacing, and usable vectoring than perfect voices. If they keep improving the pronunciation side without losing the traffic behavior, that would be a very good balance.
Friday at 04:31 PM2 days Hello guys!Thank you for your hard work and this remarkable new feature.I've just started my free trial, and I think I'll subscribe later on. I've been using AIG but that software is like it's from the early 2000s. I was wondering if the data source of FSHud's Live and Scheduled Traffic is public. There was a period of time where FSHud could be used with FSLTL, but they stopped the support.Thanks! Edited Friday at 04:32 PM2 days by Bacsa Attila
Friday at 10:05 PM1 day Wish there were more turboprop's, & single engine ifr flights other than jumbojets. Other than that and I understand FSHUD Traffic is new and some of that will hopefully come into the package later on.Happy Landings
Yesterday at 03:10 PM1 day 17 hours ago, jwhak said:Wish there were more turboprop's, & single engine ifr flights other than jumbojets. Other than that and I understand FSHUD Traffic is new and some of that will hopefully come into the package later on.Happy LandingsI run AIGTC alongside FSHud Traffic (with appropriate settings in both) so that I get quite a few executive jets, turboprops such as PC-12s etc. It livens up the traffic variety, especially as smaller airports. Ian Box
Yesterday at 05:28 PM1 day Must have been where I was at the moment. Few more flight's need to be made thanks for conformation.Happy Landings
18 hours ago18 hr I am just now realizing you use the scheduled traffic route through AIG. I am wishing FSHUD-Traffc would hurry and get the IFR Turboprops in Live Traffic other than commercial jumbo jets. My bad for not clarifying earlier.Happy Landings Edited 18 hours ago18 hr by jwhak
4 hours ago4 hr Not sure FSHud Traffic will be expanded to include non-commercial traffic - it would probably increase the cost significantly. Meanwhile running FSHud Traffic and AIGTC alongside each other works well for me. Ian Box
Create an account or sign in to comment