Ericson

That's true but this is not solution. What if you decide to make direct to shortcut or select SID / STAR / app etc ? You would have to entry this into RXP GNS and then edit flight plan via FSX planner ( and then you will find out that FSX nav database is out of date compared to RXP GNS ) Too much hassle for simple f/p change.

thank you Bert and Martin for replies.I was afraid of that. It's a shame that such good bird was spoiled by simple G500 replica. G500 looks nice on screen shots but has very limited functions and that drive me nuts. :( What the point of top notch modelling, hiring good FDE specialist, putting new landing lights etc when you have something in front of your face that can't draw magenta line from when using most popular add-on GPS unit ? :Shocked:I wish that some day Carenado will produce steam gauges version of P46T + RXP GNS530/430 :(

Hello !Could some confirm/deny that G500 works with RXP GNS 530/430 ? I had read 10's of posts and can get solid answer to decide to buy or pass. Some says it works and others have problems.1. Will Carenado's G500 show on MFD flight plan route entered into RXP GNS530/430 ?2. Will Carenado's G500 follow the changes made into active flight plan ( like selecting approach for example in RXP GNS ? )thanksEricson

WOW - I'm impressed - good job Carenado ! :( - I keep my fingers crossed for low or zero fps hit and we have very nice aircraft for 2012 season and beyond :)

just look at picture most to the right at http://www.facebook.com/Carenado ( picture showing front of the plane at dusk ) - you can see familiar triangle in front of nose landing gear.I'm also sure that if Carenado would put new landing lights into their plane they would show it at preview shots as it's increasing the value of the plane.

new pictures were added on Friday - check out www.facebook.com/carenadoIt looks like another bird with triangle landing lights... I wonder when Carenado will make "new" landing lights ( like in NGX, Lotussim, Orbx Lancair , etc. - we asked for that looong time ago )

I wonder how complex G600 simulation will be... If the same level as Microsoft's G1000 in default Cessna then I'm for steam gauges.I'm also worrying about performance as users had to switch off speed/altitude tapes and map mode to have good fps in Carenado's A36 - what's the point of that ?As I'd love to fly Carenado's PA46 I'd request "steam gauges" version for sake of FPS performance.

Cessna 335 / 340A ? Count me in ! :(

I wonder what this "new quality standard" means ? Is it : 3D gauges ?real landing lights like in lotus sim L39 ?airframe and windshield icing like in L39, f1 mustang, pmdg j41 ?sadly from preview shots I don't see anything from list above... I like Carenado very much, coz they released in the past models that I've been dreaming about ( FS dreams :( ) but world keeps spinning and standard of FSX planes is going up as well as customer's expectations.Carenado, you are the masters in external models and please be masters regarding visuals inside the plane too :(

FS9 for big stuff - big and complex planes and big airportsFSX for light ( piston prop ) stuff but only to use photo scenery with resolution higher than 4.8 m/pix I just bought new i5 / 4 gb / gtx 260 rig mainly for FSX and after 2 weeks of tweaking I'm only happy with light planes and photosceneries. Complex airliner/turboprop and big custom airport is no-no for me as I expect solid 30 fps and nothing less. It's incredible how FSX can eat up resources without giving too much in return. but...FS9 performance is sweet thanks to intel's turbo mode on i5. I never enjoyed FS9 so much as I do it now. I can throw anything at it and it will keep going...

Hello ! I've some photo scenery made from both bgl files and agn files. In certain areas I ( mostly around major airports ) I would like to remove autogen by deleting agn files to improve performance but I would like to keep autogen outside big cities. The problem is I can't guess which files to delete by looking at their names. Name of agn files is composed from several numbers. How determine which file is responsible for certain area ? Thanks !

I hope for Cessna T303. I saw one in Santiago, Chile :(

does new PA-28-181 from Carenado has any of features introduced in L39 from Lotussim ? I mean new landing lights and/or other L39 goodies :)

Wow, this L-39 sets new standards in aircraft models. I can't imagine now buying anything without such realistic landing lights and other goodies shown on the movie :(

I also hope that they will release 2 AND 3 blade versions. Funny thing, that one blade in prop makes such a difference how Seneca looks. I'm 3 blade fan of course :(