GregB145

Or even better combine forces

Just make sure he does not wear a white cotton T shirt

No need to read the manual Kyle, if you wait here long enough then all the daft questions get asked sooner or later, as well as some very pertinent ones on occasion. Failing that I will ask my wife, because apparently, she is never wrong

Rob, Can you fly for the VA without using Vatsim etc?

Well, with great serendipity I purchased AS Next 2 days ago but had not got around to installing it on my networked machine. That was the job for this evening, its on and running nicely and is fantastic. The ball is in your court now PMDG, no pressure!

Easy mistake to make by Morvious. So before you have a go at him, look at what happened - A question from a low post member that had been asked many, many times before and has a history of causing internecine strife on the forums between those that think 2D is vital and those that do not... Followed by an indignant, contentious reply from that same member calling the majority of the forum members thick. I thnk the need for "grip" lies somewhere else. :Thinking: :wink:

Whilst there is the chain of thought on here that new posters should perform a search before posting a question to both avoid repeating the question ad infinitum (with the same answer), the chain of thought that a polite response is called for is also equally valid and welcome in my humble opinion. However, with your strong statement that, after 2 years on the forum, in your weighty opinion 75% of the population here is a bit stupid (and I would have thought that if you had spent 2 years on here you might have seen one of the multiple threads on here regarding 2d panels, weather radar, release dates etc) and then following up with a rant that because the AVSIM forum guidelines do not require a search to see if something has been asked before. It confirms the old adage that rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men. You had my sympathy about those asking you to get back in your box and perform a search, right up until you called 3/4 of the people on here stupid.......... How is it in the 75th percentile then matey?

It's a cracking Bluray Luke. Really well shot, fantastically edited and a brilliant overview showcasing the capabilities of the 777F. The performance and power of the aircraft is evident in the shortness of the takeoff roll from Leipzig to Bergamo with a light load of cargo and fuel. According to their website, there is a MD-11F in the works as well

I'm looking forward in the time between now and the release to the other snippets of information from Mr R and the team as to what features they have managed to shoe horn in there that we have not seen before. :england-flag: Oh and ORBX and PFPX which all together will make a pretty impressive triple act. However, as typical I'm in the middle of emigrating to Australia, my PC is packed away and I will not see it again until December. Bugger!

Paine to KLAX as a shakeout with the 200LR. Then KLAX to OMDB. Might as well go big early!

I like it as well, the old livery is a hard act to follow. Was a PMDG 777 Beta model used for the video though??? :huh:

Thanks Luke, but that was a while ago and things change

Rob, Thanks for the update I'm looking forward to the day I get to load it up and really dig into the systems and of course fly some of the great T7 routes available. However I have a small question for you in that, you have mentioned the status of the 777LR and -300ER, but where in the cycle does the 777F sit? Is it going to be an addition to the LR (being fairly similar) or an expansion released after the LR or the -300ER? Thanks Greg

I liked it in the MD-11 as well and it would be good to see it in the T7. In conjunction with GSX, it would fit in nicely.

Enter the GPS position again! I think its to do with entering it before the IRS's have run through their self tests.