-
Content Count
455 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by yidahoo
-
-
X-Plane.org has a series of useful tutorials on how to fly helicopters http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showforum=109
- 1
-
Wrong MD-80 project
Yep there is not just one but two in progress at the moment. I think I will be buying both based on how they are shaping up at the moment
-
But X-Plane 10 does have auto-gen sitting on top of photo scenery be it default, OSM or some of the incredible World2X-Plane stuff where buildings almost perfectly match the ortho underlays
- 1
-
I just don't get the point of flying over flat world it's to 90s for me.
Seems to me someone is visiting us from the FSX/P3D world.
- 1
-
With seeing those nice pics I really would like to try SMP3 for myself.
It seems alas like it's not my month for X-Plane vendors! Firstly I wrote to the Org Store a couple of weeks back about a broken download link and never heard a peep, and now I appear to be at an impasse with X-Aviation.
Humbug, never mind it's back to P3Dv3 for now then. :wink:
Stick with it, X-Aviation is getting hammered at the moment, it seems this is their most popular product ever. I am sure they will get to you as soon as they can. My experience of their customer service has been nothing but exemplary
-
You certainly should be getting better fps than that. I know the 5K iMacs run XP pretty well and your set up is has as much if not more power than them. One thing to note is XP does not support SLI so its possible there is some sort of conflict there. Another thing that can bring XP to its knees is busting the RAM/VRAM limits. If you are using something like OSM scenery this is easily done.
-
I suspect they might have been waiting for the recent data ref update that, if I remember correctly, allows third party dev to add seasonal changes easily.
-
So many nice little products coming out for X-Plane at the moment. Its a shame a lot of them don't get the publicity they deserve. We need some AVSIM reviews of these gems
-
When I was at the convention last June, there was some mention from Austin or someone about switching from OpenGL to DirectX. The phrase seemed to hint at a limitation of OpenGL. No one laughed about it, so it seemed like it was not a joke or maybe no one got it?
There is one simple reason X-Plane will not go to DirectX. They would lose 30% of their customer base, thse that use Apple and Linux. I believe Ben Supnik wrote recently they are looking at the newer graphics engines but thats a long way in the future.
-
They should release it as a n open beta. I wouldn't hesitate to hand over some cash for this bird!
I suspect that would slow down the beta process. People filing bugs that are actually features. Better to have a hand picked bunch of people who know what's what. That way the problems can be isolated much quicker.
-
Yes it does, because it is basically the same version as the disk version
-
Ben has explained why Steam does not get Betas. Its because they would have to cut two different versions of X-Plane. Ben's Quote
"No. As I have said before, we are not running the public beta process over steam. Doing so would double the development time of pushing beta builds."
-
It's in beta at the moment
-
LES Citation for sure
PMDG DC6
IXEG 733
World Traffic 2
and version 3 of SkyMaxx
Qualitywings 787 - looks stunning, yes but not being made for X-Plane.
-
Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but FF actually surveyed the X-Plane community a while back, and many people wanted a better 787 than what we've got (or not anymore: Heinz Dziurowitz has unfortunately passed on and all his planes have been pulled off the store: RIP, Heinz). But FF still chose to do a 767. Strange, though I supposed it was the natural choice after the 757 (by that same logic, then the 787 is the natural choice after the 777...) The 787 is truly an all-new bird with completely rewritten rules - everything is electric. Oh, well, can't have everything you want. I hope the 767 pilots enjoy this release.
Don't forget they are also working on the professional version of the A350 a similarly complex machine as the 787. Not sure they have the manpower to do two highly detailed aircraft at the same time. The 767 will be using a lot of the code from the 757, I would imagine.
-
Having been there, I would say they have captured it well, especially the subtleties of the colours.
-
Amazing. I only have the .40b5 demo but sitting at KSEA with these settings on an 4790K with a 970GTX the frames are down to 4. On 4K though.
Something wrong there. 4K should not take a huge bite out of a 970GTX. I get 30-35 with very high settings at KSEA in standard HD on a 4690k clocked to 4.2 and a 970. Drops to mid 20's with a complex addon.
-
Is it just me or do the gauges on the pictures just look like someone took a photograph of the real gauge and pasted it in? If so I would assume the gauges will be modeled at a later date.
Gauges in my opinion have always looked much sharper and more realistic in X-Plane so I would imagine they are the real in-sim gauges, not cut and paste photos
-
MisterX6 amongst a number of others is producing some superb freeware. http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=26819
-
Have you tried RC 4 in X-Plane? It works very well with the new plugin
-
From what I understand the X-Plane DC6 has been in development for at least two years maybe more. Nobody knows what else has been in development for X-Plane at the same time, but there has been hints of a second project. The first one is always going to have the longest development time but I would imagine converting the current range will take less time. Especially as all the relevant research has already been done for FSX/P3D and they will have learnt a lot from the DC6
Jason Row
-
Same here, but I suspect it might just be a website error that they have not noticed. They posted a fairly big update a few days ago so I think they are still working.
-
This - this is the BEST thing about X-Plane. I tried FSX, and add-ons for it nearly always default to install to C:\Program Files\, and sometimes if the install path was changed, the add-ons didn't work. I very quickly went back to X-Plane.
I hope PMDG makes life easy for us (and probably themselves too) and give us a simple .zip file that we decompress into our /Aircraft folder when we download their X-Plane products - no installers.
Let's hope so, thats how virtually all current X-Plane developers do it, and they still maintain their piracy protection with simple installations.
-
Any reviews or thoughts? This should be a big deal for XPX.
I agree, I desperately want to buy this but not until I have seen some reviews and or comments criticisms. RC4 is an excellent program and if it works as well in XP10 as FSX then this plugin should a a winner.
I got some XP money burning a hole in my pocket
in The X-Plane General Discussions Forum
Posted
I am impatiently waiting for the 737-300, the Rotatesim MD80, The X-Craft e-175, the PMDG DC6 and approval on an overdraft from my bank manager