Ben Cap

I’m having the same issue. Minimal settings with default scenery and aircraft and experiencing stutters. The framerates are very good it just stutters terribly.

I also have had significant stutters that were never present in 4.5 using the same settings. I've tried deleting the shaders in the Appdata/local folder. I've tried various settings and even turned down graphical settings to close to nothing and nothing seems to work. Curious to see progress in this area since I am not the only one.

Thank you! This new beta appears to have resolved the visibility issues. I am enjoying this version

How do I download the beta?

REX has underwhelmed me in recent years. Yet another product that will be shelved. Marketing is a powerful tool. EF has great potential but it’s current implementation is poor.

Has anyone had any issues with visibility? When I used EF in auto mode and no weather smoothing, the visibility at the surface does not match the reported conditions in ASP4. What config do I need to use such that ASP4 changes my visibility?

It appears this is an issue with REX EF. I uninstalled REX EF my shaders HLSL folder and my shaders folder in APPDATA/LOCAL/LOCKHEEDMARTIN. I will be contacting REX about this. Thank you for the help.

After doing a clean install of P3D 4.5 hotfix 1, I cannot seem to get the visibility to work correctly. Even when using manual weather settings (no weather engine at all), the visibility slider does not make any difference. Even with it set to 1/8 mile the visibility rendered is nearly unlimited. Any ideas?

Hi, I am building an i9 system that will power 3 4K projectors in a large cockpit setup using P3D v4.5 For performance needs would I be better off with 2 2080tis in SLI or a single Titan?

I will talk to my superiors and try all three configurations. RTX Titan, RTX 2080ti Nvlink, RTX2080ti OC

I need massive GPU horsepower. PC will be outputting to 3 4k projectors. Would a single RTX Titan be a better choice?

Thank you for the help everyone. My build will be with an i9, RTX 2080ti in SLI, 32GB of fast RAM. I will be overclocking the i9 extensively.

I am tasked with building a computer for a large simulator setup. My budget is $10,000. What is the most powerful setup I can build? Thank you for any help

Having flown in a real life Delta 777 simulator recently, I can attest that the PMDG flight model accurately models the pitch trim.

Comes from up top.... The arrogance of some of the devs on this forum is laughable. One tiny criticism turns into a flamewar. Why can't Mr. Rogers simply try and lend a helping hand instead of always being on the defensive? Yes Mr. Rogers you know alot about planes and that is fine and dandy. It's unfortunate you use your presumed authority on an online forum to berate others. Foolish behaviour. And no, your products are not perfect like you all seem to think.

I'm surprised their site is down. You would think they would have thought out the website loads beforehand.

You can always fall back onto the TSS 747 GE sounds if you are unsatisfied. Their rendition of the CF6s on the 747 is excellent.

I have the same problem - can someone resolve this issue for me?

To upgrade to the latest driver, head over to http://www.geforce.com/drivers and fill out the information for your computer in the "Manual Driver Search" form. Then, download the latest Nvidia Driver and install the driver. After, I always restart my PC for good measure. Also, there is no "best version" for FSX. Simply choose the latest driver that is a WHQL(official driver release).

Did you upgrade or clean install the new OS? If you simply upgraded, delete your shader cache and try again.

That's unfortunate. I use Prepar3d 2.5 and the upgrade from Win7 to Win10 was flawless. So far, I have had absolutely no issues with compatibility with ANY of my addon software or other programs that I have installed. I am very pleased with Windows 10. I reckon that this will become the new OS of choice for us flight simmers due to its inherent backwards compatibility and ease of use with a desktop(ability to switch from Desktop and Tablet Mode). I agree. I am greatly enjoying it so far. Gorgeous menus and options screens as well.

Looks incredible!

Ehh it varies person to person. With me, using the Saitek equipment, I found flying a Cessna 172 in real life not to be too far off from the simulator.

Exactly.

Thanks for the explanation. Also, if no obstacles are in the way, should FIELD technically be the standard LIMIT code? Does that make sense? Precisely this.... Most heavy takeoffs above 700,000LBS rarely are at Flaps 15. The only time I ever get a Flaps 15 calculation is when I am at moderate loads (550-680k LBS) paired with a 9-10k foot runway. However, 90% of the time, takeoffs are at Flaps 5 due to the takeoff thrust required being slightly lower which reduces costs for the airline and the chances of an engine failure on departure. Last week out of LAX, I had my first Flaps 15 departure in a while due to my weight being 680,000LBS and using the shorter (10,100feet) runway 24L. Although, the thrust required was Full-TO with bleeds off.-This was the case due to the increased drag from the Flaps 15 setting that needed to be overcome with an increased level of thrust. Even though the takeoff roll was relatively short, the intial climb was only a shallow 11-13 degrees...