Ianrivaldosmith
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
-
-
Motion vectors.
-
Because there is rarely any need to go through that debacle.
-
People still stand on one leg whilst touching their nose and rubbing their hair (DDU etc) when installing a new driver? Some of the advice in here, I forgot I was in 2026 for a moment…
-
So, Navigraph is 9 USD a month. I could just pay an extra 6 USD per month, subscribe to Say Intentions and have controlled AI? Plus MSFS2024 comes with its own charts, free of charge right? So, it seems 6 USD extra per month is worth it for say intentions. Am I missing something?
-
That is not what I said at all. Let me rephrase so we are on the same page. The video does not do the new product any justice, so, for someone who is not a sim aficionado, such as yourself, it could put them off purchasing, yes. I am not sure how hard that is to understand. And no, I did not sit here, screaming at my own mind. I am not sure where you dredge that derogatory stuff from, but it isn't welcome here. As for X-plane.org, I certainly won't be buying anything through them, they are about as friendly as you, but that's a whole other story. Good day. 😘
-
Who said I was repulsed? No one. There are not a lot of other addons like X-World pro, though, and the original video that started this discussion doesn't do it any justice with textures on the ground that look like they come from 2002. I am not so sure what is so hard to grasp about 1.) someone's opinions and 2.) being able to express that opinion. I never said that he did care. I reiterate, I said the textures in the video are awful and look like they come from 2002. If you are happy with that then fine, I have no issue with that. For me, it is a slight issue, for you or others it's not. Great.
-
That's like modelling a new shirt, with no trousers on, because trousers are not part of the package.
-
I didn't say it was. Monetisation is irrelevant; the textures do the product zero favours. They look like something from 2002. If it were my product, I wouldn't be happy with someone advertising it that way, good intentions or not. My comment was in a civilised way, thank you very much. The same applies to you, if you don't like my opinion, just close the tab, or scroll on by, or if you must reply at least word your reply in a constructive manner instead of just 'do a better one'. Hypocrisy.
-
This looks decent, might give it a try, because if it is half as good as XP12 streaming popouts, then it will be golden!
-
Of course it is constructive. I said the ground textures were awful, look like something from 2002, and it doesn’t help the product. I didn’t just say ‘rubbish’ did I? They’re trying to showcase a product, and in my opinion doing a bad job. What more do you want? However, you seemed fit to call me a ‘troublemaker’, with no ability therefore no opinion, all because you didn’t like my opinion. I think you need to take a good look in the mirror. Goodbye.
-
Rubbish. Of course you can criticise. You do not need to be a chef to know a dish is burnt, or a director to know a movie has terrible pacing. Valid feedback relies on recognising the end result, not just the technical execution.
-
Why would I? I am not a video creator, nor am I promoting a product, but that does not stop me from having an opinion. 'Do a better one' is just a stupid, defensive, thing to say. I share my opinion because I want people to do better. I don't need to be a chef to know when a meal is burnt.
-
To me this is not really a good video to showcase a product. His ground textures look like something out of 2002.
