Sergey Stoy

Would you like to try this: Download these aircraft.cfg and the .air file. Put the .air. in the MD-11F folder, backing up the original.Open .cfg, do not pay attention to the Weight and balance section ...just scroll down and carefully find the only difference(maybe two!!! small) from the original one, backup the original and make the change..... http://1drv.ms/1pTDNjT

Download these aircraft.cfg and the .air file. Put the .air. in the MD-11F folder, backing up the original.Open .cfg, do not pay attention to the Weight and balance section ...just scroll down and carefully find the only difference(maybe two!!! small) from the original one, backup the original and make the change..... http://1drv.ms/1pTDNjT Have fun

With respect to LM but honestly I would say that the user interface of P3D is very UGLY and something is still wrong with this sim.

Yes, about the idle taxing there is an uncertainty - it is needed more tests because of some implemented dynamical frictions but generally speaking to adjust that is nor a problem at all;second in my opinion the aircraft now has good induced drag generated by the angle of attack.I think the climb performance is acceptable,cruse also,but I understand that the climb is a challenge because needs fine adjustment in the engine characteristics especially the transition between M levels.Everything could be done but needs a lot of testing, for me alone that is practically impossible.Just the adjust the primer engine graphs I have flown maybe 100 climbs...with more people involved we can adjust everything.The problem here is that for initial calculus I use approximated methods and after that goes the most difficult...long hours of taking off, climbing, adjusting and again and with different TO weights the task is going crazy for one. PMDG however did tremendous job with the visual models adjustment and that makes the aircraft very well balanced and capable for fine adjustments...

There are mine - I tried to implement the real characteristics of the engine along with drag characteristics and lift ones as function of M.All the data is obtained from NASA articles where the drag and lift graphics are especially presented.As reference real AFM was used for the 800/900.My goal was to achieve 5% accuracy for cruise regime on N1 and the hour fuel consumption.I have changed some of the most radical PMDG parameters as drag of the landing gear which was 3 times bigger than the drag of the whole aircraft on zero lift on low M.

Would you like to try those http://simviation.com/1/search?submit=1&keywords=sergey+stoyanov&x=18&y=9 tunnings...

Interesting, who told you that the FD of MSFX is not realistic?

Have you seen the explanations about AIR file in P3D SDK - is it a joke or what one person can do with the Xcg/MAC in PMDG 737NGX, or how the engine characteristics are presented mostly around the paid addons or where is the reference point for W/B calculations in Level D 767 and more....nothing in my quite opinion flies, even close to the real plane...no offence - just opinion...I think that must be changed, but hopefully would not..

I believe would be not this mathematical(engineering) mess as 737...or...?

Who told you that LD767 can be used in shared cockpit ....

OPUS - one advice..dont buy it...for now....