Sunaru

No takers? :( And Steve, beautiful job on that PAL livery! You might not need to transfer the registration to the 777-300 when PMDG releases that though, RP-C7773 (with wheel well registration 773 as a result) is a real life PAL 777-300. That way, both this 772 will have a neat registration on the wheel well (777), and the 773 will have a nicely fitting one that's accurate to the real world!

>They haven't closed and RPLL is still on its way. Hooray! This news has made me so happy, I'll get Rarotonga & KSLC as well now probably! It's always upsetting to land your PAL fleet in Manila coming from anywhere else in the Philippines or Singapore, only to land in a generic airport after all these years. It's also great to hear it's nothing serious (as far as we may know), so it's all good news. :lol:

I hope they'll at least finish RPLL and other running projects. They had all the groundwork done, and they were working on T1. It seemed to be coming along nicely for a Q4 2013 release. A lot of people at the PFSG were looking forward to it. It'd be great to have it done at their quality; I find myself flying to Chubu very often, just because of the airport. :lol:

... Words fail me. I was IMMENSELY looking forward to their RPLL scenery seeing as I had built up quite the PAL fleet. Guess I'll have to wait some more for someone to finally give Manila some love. :( I'd be more emphatic to whatever caused them to shut down, but the way they quit/the farewell message is so blunt and out of nowhere I'm really not given much to go on. If it really is a family emergency or some other dramatic event, it's beyond saying that I hope all goes well for them; but if it's a small company that just decided it had enough, I'll be deeply upset they didn't at least finish RPLL/their running projects. It wouldn't be the first time this happens, a small group that starts ambitiously on a project, only to vanish after a while with all the effort/manhours down the drain. Their forums have closed as well, so I guess they're really calling it quits?

Would anyone be so kind as to modify the SIA 777 livery/make a SIA 777 livery into the previous livery tone? I'm only asking because I hope it's not that hard to do, and my last flight to the Philippines with my parents was in a "Jubilee" 772 owned by SIA (flight SQ 918) and I'd love to redo that (in lieu of a 772ER) at any time in my virtual skies. All that'd really need to be done is to: - rescale the font of the "Singapore Airlines" titles and the Singaporean flag on the side as well as the Silver Kris on the tail - Color the entire tail, thus removing the little white area at the bottom - add "Jubilee" titles. - move the start of the black/yellow cheatlines back one window - add the SIA engine decal back on the engines New SIA 777: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_PER_Koch-3.jpg/640px-Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_PER_Koch-3.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_PER_Koch-3.jpg/640px-Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_PER_Koch-3.jpg "Old" SIA 777: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/38/Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_PER_Koch-1.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Singapore_Airlines_Boeing_777-200ER_at_Perth_Airport_Smith-1.jpg Here's hoping anyone can spare some time! Personal emotional reasons aside, I'd also generally prefer the older font/detailing. The new font seems way too showy on anything but an A380. No SIA plane I have in my hangar sees much use if they have the new detailing.

With all due respect, repeating the question isn't going to magically change the answers. Your budget is simply insufficient to get the performance you're desiring from FSX, especially if you're going to cling to the demand for a laptop as well. FSX is a **** to get working properly, on top of the required components, you need OC, enough memory, ... ; things that are much harder with a laptop. I would advise you to save up some more (which would be worth the wait!), try to look second-hand/build a computer (which would teach you skills that'd come in handy for FSX!) or go to FS9 and a less powerful computer (which would net you a bigger library of Philippine scenery).

Using the search function once in a while can help. http://forum.avsim.net/topic/409236-best-ai-traffic-solution/

These are some really ludicrous claims that are being made. Merely because it's a lite and low-fidelity rendition of the airplane priced at normal pricing for the country it was made in, claims are being made of the developers being on crack, the product being downright "crap"... Not every add-on is PMDG's detail level, and not every developer is PMDG. Besides, there's devs that nickle and dime you much more than Aerosim like Abacus or CLS or, if I'm to be brash, a certain Captain (if you don't put in the added effort to make it work).

In all fairness, while I don't think CS sells "junk" intentionally, I don't think it's the better of the 2 offerings either. It's not bad once you get to tweak it and help it get up and running, but I found the QW 757 to be better value for money. After all, even though CS products can be gotten to work in nearly all cases or even work out of the box, not every user is interested in doing just that. If we're honest with ourselves, this (having to tinker with a purchased product) shouldn't even be considered acceptable standard. That said, I think Martin has been helped satisfactory and the thread can gently be laid to rest -before it turns into a CS bash fest- on the conclusion that CS' 757 may be worth it at a sale and after some tinkering and certainly isn't rubbish, but right out of the box (and subjectively even against a tinkered CS) QW's 757 is probably going to be your better choice. With regards to the niggly issue you found though Martin: you can load your flight path in FSX's Flight Planner and then load it up from there into the FMS. That shouldn't take more than, say, a minute or so. It's a workaround, granted, but it's faster than manually having to re-enter everything! Glad you found a rendition you like in any case, the 757 is a marvelous bird in my book. ^_^

Well, it was their first product ever and made as a FS9/FSX product, if memory serves. This could explain the graphics looking out of date compared to the NGX. As far as FMC goes... It's a bit of a hassle to have to open the 2D FMC, sure, but I personally find it easier to use at times. Plus, they didn't really know where to strike the balance at the time between simplification and complexity, something they learned much better with the Avro offering. All in all, you made the right choice, it's just that the right choice still comes nowhere close to the PMDG 737. You'll have to wait for Level-D's 757 for that. ^_^

I'd be surprised if the consensus on Avsim swung to CS between the 2 757 offerings... That said, it's not the cheaper one, not even when comparing base pack CS vs QW. I have both and the CS version isn't worth it. The systems fidelity may be a bit more fleshed out, and you getting a thin veneer that shines brighter in the graphics department, but you pay for with with less realism in the flight dynamics and handling, poor sounds, bugs that still haven't been ironed out after all this time and plenty other issues that shouldn't be there anymore. QW's 757 is a rather simplified rendition, but you get all versions of the 757, the flight dynamics are more accurate, the sounds are bearable and all the systems that do work, work. In essence, QW's 757 should be able to at the very least tide you over until Level-D's 757 launches and gives you full fidelity. The 757 is my favorite aircraft ever designed and I'm eagerly awaiting Level-D's work, but until it comes out of being vaporware, QW will please you the best.

As a Pinoy/Belgian: Pacific Island Simulation's RPLL. Combined with PMDG's 777 release, I'll be doing flights between my Aerosoft EBBR scenery and RPLL all the time I fear! :lol: That aside, Wing Creation's Narita, Aerosoft's Rome Fiumucino, and if Chris knows which dev is doing CYYZ, I'd be interested in that too!

Which is exactly what I'm hoping for. Well, perhaps not exactly, as I think it'd be better to just have people weigh in on the best three or so developers of a scenery/plane/whatever rather than a poll, but the gist of it is similar. I find it strange that there's no "best of" threads pinned to the forum and had hoped a mod could pin this, or at the very lease use it as inspiration for one that can be modded. Threads like this one, like "which AI package is best" etc could all be stopped thus.

Would you rather tell people to "go figure out the better developer on your own" then? All I'm trying to do is pool together which developer's rendition of each plane is considered the one most worthy of spending money on. I realise "best" is subjective, but even with that, there's no denying there are better renditions than others and some are carried much more as such. If I were to list every rendition of every plane, I'd have to add Abacus as well, and you can be sure there's at least one misguided soul that'll claim Abacus is "best" and thus, with what you said in mind, destroying the purpose of the thread. Flight Simming is already an expensive hobby, and I'm sure a thread like this can have merit to avoid bad purchases and help people along. I'm not saying all these planes are "must-buy", but it'd help people looking for XYZ to get the best rendition of XYZ on the market. Whether or not they want to buy it is up to them!