Jump to content

AirborneZed

Members
  • Content Count

    803
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

168 Excellent

About AirborneZed

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 08/12/1995

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    KTMB
  • Interests
    Flying loud metal machines

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    VATSIM
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

1,938 profile views
  1. I miss spoke, I meant Laminar Research, LR. Not LM. Mixed that up. I meant for Xplane. Thanks anyway !
  2. Well that's a darn shame. If anyone wants to take the plunge, im willing to pay for a GNS 530 mod for this plane. No joke. Thanks for your help, I really hope LM makes a way to customize avionics as easily as Flightsim. This is honestly a bummer.
  3. I'm aware I can fit one there, question is how do I Remove the two 430s, and add the 530 along with the bezel and working buttons in that space? Is that something that just cant be done without 3d modeling?
  4. Is there any way at all to implement the RXP GNS 530W into the Carenado baron in the 3d cockpit? I tried figuring it out through the Default baron tutorial but it left me nowhere. How can I physically replace the two Default GNS 430s in the virtual cockpit for one GNS 530? Much appreciated
  5. Agree with the "toyish" remark. The displays look mushy. On top of that, they have a very low refresh rate. Could be a performance compromise. I'm silently hoping they improve them.
  6. Great! because you have until January 14th to upgrade. Microsoft will kill support of Win 7. the future is now.
  7. Shawn, I misread your original comment as "does not have the fidelity". It was early in the morning and I recant my reply. Apologies for the confusion. I do agree with the pricing trend in our hobby becoming an issue. I suppose one could argue addons today are only getting better and more complex than years prior. It might be the new normal soon, unfortunately.
  8. The Aerosoft Airbus' systems modeling is less than half of the what FSLabs models (including failures). This is a fundamental fact between both of them. All opinions respected of course, but please be careful.
  9. I always enable it. I believe it gives meaning to checklists and flows. If the plane is always going to work perfectly, what's the point? . Which leads me to mention that the release of Global Flight Ops will add a whole new layer of motivation to use checklists. Jumping into a used airplane with possible faults makes thing more interesting.
  10. Keep in mind that radar sweep speeds are dependent on the range that you have selected on the N.D ( Nav Display). ie. The sweep is faster at 40nm range than 160nm or 320
  11. http://www.flythemaddogx.com/
  12. Does this allow the display of autogen over the orthophoto in P3D?
  13. @lasnubes Out of left field but does the integration with Navigraph charts have a high and low altitude en-route chart mode?
  14. I read the 777 Intro manual and found the service based failures to be quite a cool feature. I do have a question, however. Quoting Page 108 of the Intro Manual Does this mean that over time you'll notice oil/hydraulic levels slowly decreasing? Or is it more of a sudden failure with no indication leading up to the danger? I'm really intrigued by this.
×
×
  • Create New...