violingineer

Members
  • Content count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

249 profile views
  1. violingineer

    Anybody care to review the Cheyenne III?

    Ummmm. No. The lite model might be a help, but the FPS is SHIIIIIITTE regardless. And that includes the Avidyne off. To give you an idea, the Alabeo Mooney gets 60 fps where the LITE Cheyenne II gets about 44 fps. Unacceptable.
  2. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    I'm just glad I got a reply from Mr. Pieke ;)
  3. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    Although I personally know nothing about this plane's design, I know folks at my work who do, and who visit Kerrville a lot. My former boss just signed the TC on this one: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2017/march/30/new-mooney-ultras-certified Fun near Reno: Here I've edited the GPS and swapped it with my version of the Baytower GPS with Kronzky's (http://kronzky.info/fs/500wx/) algorithm for relative terrain, which sorta looks like the RXP rel-terrain, but a little more interpolation in the colors (not official Garmin), but I modified Kronzky's green to black which fits the real life colors better. I have this rel-terrain in my personal-use-only xml versions for RealAir GNS530, Carenado GNS530 and Baytower530. I frankenstein gauges and cockpits a lot for my own purpose---BTW, the EDM/GEM in this Mooney (like most other Alabeo/Carenado GEMs) doesn't really have a light map, so you can put in just about any gauge that fits the diameter in there. I have tried the LRI (lift reserve indicator) from the FSX DC3, an AOA from the FSX learjet, AOA from the freeware Iris T-6 Texan (http://www.rikoooo.com/downloads/viewdownload/62/548), and a radar altimeter---all work pretty good, the LRI looks a little scratchy on the edges, but the Iris AOA always looks great. That is if one prefers AOA over the GEM, since cyl head temp and EGT are already redundant on this plane. I'd imagine a g-meter would work pretty good in that spot too. Again, I wish developers would make their cockpits more editable. Now just need some repaint masters like Ron Attwood to kick out some gnarly colors for this beast!
  4. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    I just throw the Baytower (RV7) GNS530 in all my planes. Run the Alabeo RXP converter, then edit the panel to put in your choice of GPS. (The RXP converter works as a generic GNS530 converter.) I like Baytower because he actually bothered to make the text readable. BTW, the Mooney gets 3 FPS slower than the Saratoga. But it gets about 15-20 knots cruise faster, so take your pick! I can't decide!
  5. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    OK, I took the plunge and bought this plane 2 hours ago. Money well spent. buy it. IMO: THIS IS THE BEST ALABEO RELEASE YET. I grade it A+ All is good in in terms of FPS, window placement visibility, instrument placement, GPS integration (must have a 530 for me to like--my pref), cruising speed, instruments chosen to be included (GEM, fuel mgmt, EGT & engine gauges easy to read, older KFC150 AP w/easy functionality), liveries/paints, cockpit/external landing/taxiing lighting--just absolutely the best plane. This may beat Baytower/Alabeo Saratoga for my number one go-to single, NM, at the moment it has, lol. Nitpicks: - ASI has too small lettering, I can fix this myself with texture editor, but really, make it easier to read. - GEM gauge buttons do not work AFAIK. - sounds could be better/more immersive, but honestly for Alabeo, its not bad at all. (B+) - Airplane seems a bit slippery; really needs a lot of speed brakes, but nothing surprising here for a Mooney. It also has a nice slippery rudder feel in the turns which isn't really a nitpick. I made ZERO changes to this aircraft. It is good right out of the box. Which only a few have ever been this good for me. As far as GPS terrain stutter, this does not have it---at least it is not noticeable as much as the C310. And did I mention framerate? Excellent. BUY IT. (Edit: I did change the default Alabeo wind sound (it sucks.))
  6. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    Interesting. Scenery has intermittent effect on fps, while the VC has a constant effect. I test without sceneries that are inconsistent, or I simply move all the sliders add weather and check fps on the ground in the exact same view per aircraft. So your stuttering probably has a lot to do with the sceneries. I was originally talking about the gps terrain mode linked into the model in a way that the vc will stutter with terrain map update this will happen at 60 fps on a default frame rate friendly airplane if not coded correctly and though it says 60fps the view stutters at 1hz. Interesting to see your fps on those planes. The tripacer is very close to default frame rates. I consistently get 60 fps on the pacer. I dont use ftx/orbx, not worth the fps hit for me, as there are other products that dont hit frames as much that work for me. I dont see much perf hit with 4096 textures either, they just dont hurt my system...not that I use them, I always use the c310 lite version, I think its stupid to offer 4096 textures on a vc or exterior when Id much rather see 4096 textures resources (finite) on the ground at lower altitudes than anywhere else...as a trade off... Big clear gauges should be developers focus rather than pretty paint jobs ... Hence Real Air, depressed to see them go. Love to see more results on fps.
  7. violingineer

    Alabeo Mooney M20R released!

    I'll ask what my question is ALWAYS with Carenado/Alabeo. Framerate inconsistency between planes. A) Please reply if rates are on par with one of the below: 1) Early Carenado Mooney/Bonanza/AC11/C172/Arrow IV, Alabeo Cutlass (basically FSX default rates) 2) "Frame rate Friendly" (Such as Alabeo Saratoga or C310). 3) Lower rates (but still steam gauge speeds), such as Piper Aztec, C340, Piper Seminole (yes, this is in a slower frame class than 2 above) 4) Terrible, such as all/most of their Bizjets, or anything with their Avidyne EX500 or G1000 glass cockpits, such as C182, Meridian, TBM. I would expect this plane should be close to the (2) category, especially the C310... which isn't as good as the Saratoga for the quality of bling, but not bad. B) Test this: With the Mooney's basic GPS/GNS-530 on terrain display mode, during a hard turn, does the terrain refresh make the VC view out the cockpit pause on update? This is inconsistent on their (really on all P3D/FSX) payware planes. Some have it, some don't. If it has this problem, you will notice during the turn that the frame rate should be smooth except for a "clicking" type pause when the terrain display on the GPS terrain updates every 1-2 seconds or so. It is REALLY annoying and I will not put up with it. The Alabeo Saratoga and C310 do NOT have this, while the otherwise superior frame rate Carenado AC11 does, as does the Cardinal, I believe.
  8. violingineer

    FDE Input - Good - Bad - or - Ugly ?

    FDE is very subjective. So are sounds. But sounds are definitely what makes the experience more gratifying/soulful. That said, sounds are also the most difficult for developers to do right, and actually record well. To do the sounds right... you have to record both channels separately for stereo, leaving all room or environmental acoustics and loop ticks/phasing/artifacts reduced as much as possible. Real Air did this the best with the Duke and Legacy. Most developers are very poor at this, Alabeo and Carenado are somewhat inconsistent...some planes are decent some are terrible. I'd say thats the case for their products in general...just inconsistent, except for the visuals... but then again, they are inconsistent there too because sometimes they pay attention to the polygon count, and sometimes they seemingly dont care about it. I respect a developer that considers FPS the most, followed by immersion. If it has one without the other I dont like the product. Ant's does this well. Real Air almost does this well--the Duke and Legacy take some FPS hits..their older products were the best--Spitfire, SF260. Among the Alabeo line, their Saratoga TC is the best, good balance of both immersion and FPS. That said, from the above discussion, what I really wanna know is does this 310 perform like the B58/A36/F33/V35 in terms of FPS? If not, I'm not interested. Alabeo was started to be the "Lite" line from Carenado. The first 5-ish products have amazing FPS and visuals...take the Extra 300, Cutlass, great stuff. Lately though they have become bloated. I have be reading that this C310 has a "lite" VC or model, and hope that they are back to their FPS greatness. Comments? P.S. Mil-viz 310 does the customizable gauge thing very well! Which I sorely miss on most modern developer's planes. Why cant WE choose what the avionics are? In the real world you get an STC, and throw in a Garmin if you want, throw in whatever radio/GPS/ADF/radar you name it. Developers should all include a generic light map feature (the driving issue why most dont do customizable panels anymore) that keeps the avionics bay non-discriminatory ;) And also include a flat 3D VC without knobs, so you can put in whatever you want. I miss this feature from the early Carenados! I have heavily modified light maps on the B58 to fit my favorite freeware gauges, since you can remove the 3d knobs. CARENADO/ALABEO PLEASE BRING BACK THE REMOVABLE 3D KNOBS FEATURE!!! Half of the fun of the old FS games was that you could design stuff yourself--- if any of you remember one version of MSFS where they actually had a plane editor included (before GMAX).... LONG LONG time ago.
  9. violingineer

    Alabeo PA-44 Seminole released!

    After doing some investigation, agree that the G600 loses 2-5 fps. But, if you have other CArenado releases that have a G500, this one has no effect on frame rate. It is a quick and easy swap in to the Seminole. Now I get no or better frame rates with the G500 in the Seminole.
  10. violingineer

    Alabeo PA-44 Seminole released!

    Second this. Identical frame rates as the Saratoga. I have not noticed a difference in fps with the G600 on. (I just re-discovered the G600 feature after remembering that I had read about it! This hot swap panel alone makes it better than the 'toga.) Of course they still use the Carenado TAWS, which is FPS killing, but the radar is a nice addition without FPS hit---however I haven't gotten the radar to work yet. Has anyone? Also, coming from Bert, I know beyond a doubt this is a great plane.
  11. violingineer

    Recommended FPS friendly payware aircraft

    One last authoritative opinion after much standardized FPS testing on (GA) aircraft (4 year old i3570K, @4.1 GHz, GTX750ti, all of the below are 60FPS). Actually, I wanted to reply to this after my opinion of Alabeo with respect to framerate has really diminished over the years with more and more complicated releases. I thought Alabeo was the simpler arm of Carenado, now it means nothing. In order of best FPS and for me, general aviation fun: 1) Baytower RV7 (can be installed to P3Dv3) 2) Iris Grob Tutor 3) Carenado C114 4) Alabeo DA40 5) Iris Aviator Series DA42 (Iris DA40 sometimes has better framerates, sometimes not) 6) Alabeo Saratoga Actually, among this list the Iris Aviator series DA-42 blows everyone else away overall. Pity its not supported anymore. My absolute favorite plane. My opinion of Iris keeps getting better.
  12. violingineer

    Alabeo PA-44 Seminole released!

    Has anyone done a comprehensive (or not so) study on frame rates on this release? IMO Alabeo balanced frame rates with functionality and pretty graphics the best with their PA32 Saratoga. How does the Seminole compare to their Saratoga in frames? How I evaluate frames is by pushing the traffic sliders to max and sit on a tarmac in the rain and look at the frames for the exact same place and view. ... Saratoga does not quite have default fps rates, but comes close. Alabeos cutlass, tomahawk and extra all have same fps as default with Saratoga being slightly lower, and others such as da42 being especially low. Dying to know if Seminole is equal fps or lower than Saratoga? I'm talking about running pure 60 fps and nothing lower. My machine handles maxed out 60 fps with only a handful of planes, and the Saratoga comes very close...great plane. Hoping Seminole is same.