Claudius_

The universal version is working good, and better, in fs24 with my 3080.

Many problems with the default airplanes like the TBM and the A3xx inibuilds, but the good news is that the Fenix is running very well and the CPU stopped the temps spikes with my usually 60fps at 60°C. My 3080 with 12 GB vram is running at about 75% and 9Gb vram. The sim is running superfluid and smooth.

I decided to uninstall FS20 because it would be too hard to live with 2 flight sims full of bugs.

Starting a flight with excellent fps and falling to a nice slideshow after less a minute, the A3xx are crashing the sim on exit.

The TBM is unusable, horrible fps performance on my side too.

Here another misleading opinion from who is claiming expert, no matter if he is a real pilot o a flight simmer lover, or both. In my opinion FS24 will be ready for take off with updated studio level aircrafts in weeks. But I'm already satisfied with FS24 and FS20 is not anymore installed on my pc.

I never trust the so called "real life pilots", they are beginners when talking about a flight sim. Just an expert flight simmer can understand the potential of a new sim. Since day one I tried al the FS24 liners and I found a very good potential, they need to be improved, but very enjoyable and close to a studio level paid software.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm experiencing something similar to cloud turbulence with GA airplanes.

Here very good fps everywhere, but when using the TBM I'm getting a slideshow. Very good performance with the Fenix A320.

We need to copy the FBW airplanes from fs20 to fs24, or a new installer will be there?

Yes, it's because you are flying Low.

The answer is in your message: the problem is not in the sim engine, but in the airplanes: Fenix is experimental, and the Inibuilds A3xx need a lot of work to be well optimized. Generally, using GA airplanes you can have stable 60fps, this is my experience with FS24.

It seems that deactivating the motion blur improves the fps, I tested it at a gate of LIRF and I'm getting solid 60fps. But I have to test it for a planned flight.

Here the Fenix A320 for MSFS24 is flying well, very low fps at the airports but normal when flying.

Planning a flight in FS24 is not so easy and the new Simbrief option is not helping to clear things, but the B737max is promising and it has a very good feeling. The ILS autoland is not working well, so disabling the AP at 1000ft is a very good option, the flight model is not bad at all. In the walkaround I forgot the Pitot covers and I had a very bad experience, similar to one of the infamous accidents featured by the 737max: crazy "dolphining" up and down, solved disabling the stab trim and the AP. It's not perfect, but it is promising.