David_CSA

This is an amazing piece of information. Thank you all very much!

Thank you, see above.

Thank you very, very much! I believe this is exactly what I was looking for. The screenshots show it is possible to see all three trim values (aileron, elevator, rudder) and configure the information shown. Very nice, thank you!

Are you please aware of any add-on that would show the value of actual Elevator Trim setting somewhere in FS2024 while in flight? I am myself aware of 2 ways, but they are far from perfect: the default FS2024 HUD overlay - The disadvantage is it shows too much info even in the compact mode. It spoils realism. I wish to see just the trim setting. the FS HUD bar - an app I found on flghtsim.to - It does exactly as I need, but in my case it is really resource hungry: From 110fps to 65 fps. Any other options please? The default HUD would be perfect, if only we would be able to choose what to show and what not to show (e.g. many people hate the map...)

Thank you. I am on a 144Hz panel, but with full Gsync. The refresh rate therefore corresponds to the limit set to 60 fps in RTTS.

What are then the general guidelines to reduce ghosting with Frame generation, please? I use TAA with Nvidia Frame gen 2x. 1440p. Ghosting is clearly visible especially along edges of white wings against darker background such as green terrain. Other than that the picture looks fairly good.

That's a valid question. Would anyone be able to reply, please? I used saving of flights a lot prior to FS 2020. Then stopped with it exactly because of the 5 reasons above. I am on FS 2024 now but not at the moment.

Almost the same experience here! When Image Sharpening activated for the first time, the default values (at least for me) are: Sharpen on 0.50, ign. film grain on 0.17. Already that setting makes a huge difference and a lot more of detail is visible, e.g. individual leaves on trees etc. It feels very good, perhaps a tad too sharp. Will try 0.4 & 0.17 as you recommend. Thank you.

I can understand and respect what you say. My main issue is I was actually very satisfied with trees in FS2020. We had one quick fix to reduce the height and that was it; Density and placement was fairly ok there. We all love both products: 2020 and 2024. It is just a big pity the trees are not the best in FS2024. But I still enjoy flying it.

That's exactly my problem with Bijan. I love Bijan and admire his work. I did bought his product. But if he goes on fixing all places in the world ONE BY ONE.... How many decades is it going to take??? I mean...There must be some other and global solution. I also purchase the Taburet product (as I mentioned here already before). But I believe Bijan is more refined...Only it still misses a fix for myriads of places around the globe.

Oh, Noel means DLSS-DLAA...! Then it makes sense now. I did try to search for the meaning, but did not succeed. Thank you very much for clarifying it.

Hello Noel, a) Sorry, what do yo mean by NVSR? Not many people use this abbreviation. b) With your current solution, how do cap frames? Do you still use RTSS as in the TAA days? Thank you, D.

I am sensing various information about SU1 and trees. Some say they are better (smaller), some say there is even more of them. How do you see it?

Gentlemen, how does the 2024 version fly for you? Any initial reactions? I will be able to test only much later in the week. Was curious about your observations.

Great question! Also I would love to know... Could anyone please answer, if you know it? I noticed that ground handling is different even for imported FS2020 planes in FS2024. But once in the air I wasn't that sure anymore.