YouDontKnow

Referring to simbrief flight plan generation (using the Horizon simbrief profile), is anyone noticing that the fuel consumption is very accurate for the first 8-10 hours and after the consumption appears to be higher in the last hours for a very long haul flight? Is the simbrief calculation or the simulator the problem? I know that i can carry more fuel to be sure but I'm one who likes to push to the limit the plane, crossing the entire planet, so every kg counts 😄

Anybody is suffering a stuttering animation of the GSX stuff and I mean, the passengers, the trucks, the services. In the meantime the simulator works fine. the stutters are only limited to GSX.

Exactly this was the point speaking with @Cpt_Piett

I'm not sure but I understand that FSHud is able at the moment to use its own injcetor for the traffic. From the AIG it is able to take the liveries. I dont' see any clear answer about this point.

What do you mean that it injects AIG traffic? As I understood at the moment it injects its own traffic.

Which is the source of the traffic for FSHud?

Only now I'm realizing that FSHud is not able to adjust during the arrival the STAR in accordance with the weather. Very disappointing. Someone knows if it will be implemented or not?

I'm a little bit lost. Is FSHud able to control the Live traffic injected by MSFS on flight?

Yes I was speaking about "performance" setting. But the point is another. I understand that displays suck a lot of resources but is not acceptable to propose an outdate resolution of the displays in order to give more fluidity to the simulation, when around you have an incredible number of details that you barely or never see during a flight.

The proposed "performance" setting suggested by Fenix looks wired form me. Honestly, a FS2004 quality for the display is not a solution in my opinion. With a lot of things with extremely high quality of the details around the aircraft it is strange that it is proposed to reduce the quality (too much, this is the problem) of the item that you look at for the 80% of the IFR simulation, the displays. From their Discord Support Thread seems that a new update is very close. It should contain some improvements.

Unfortunately have to observe that I am not the only one with a not enough performance given by the Fenix product. I was ready to see a difference with PMDG product, as expected, but it is too much. From 35 to 28 fps it means 20% less, in an easy scenario. In the runway there is a further drop. I didn't try yet in a big airport and i suspect that it will be dramatic. I hope Fenix will make something. I remember @Aamir saying that the performance back in autumn (during their tests) was similar to FBW and actually it's not. So I think it is something that they can improve.

CTD this night during a long haul. Second time it happens on MSFS since the release.

oh, ok! That's why. I see. Asobo should also add holding patterns in the default ATC and why not, also diverting in case of bad weather.

Does anyone know if the AiG will be able to follow the correct SIDs and STARs assigned by the default ATC? Anyway, I'm really impressed by this software. Really really good. The best one.

I have to say congrats to the developers! What a job you did! I would like to have the possibility to download and install the the flightplans selecting a specifying airport that shows you which companies operate there. At that point you could select which flightplan you desire to install. A sort of filter by airport, actually. Thanks!