Niko_

At 54:03 Jorg talks about VATSIM helping them with ATC. That sounds quite promising!

According to real Airbus pilots, the iniBuilds A320/321/330 are pretty good. Personally, I don't miss anything since switching to the iniA320 in MSFS24 - the EFB on the FBW is better though. The working printer is also cool, tbf.

PACX is quite nice and simple. It's not AI though and you have to download the airline specific safety briefing and boarding music yourself

Has anyone tried using live traffic yet?

All those videos showed a stripped-down version. The new AI system wasn´t included yet and there were like two different ship models

Maybe Kaiii could tell us, whether MSFS24 will allow third-party devs to use/controll the injected default live traffic 😏

BATC pays for offline-data. It's not injecting live traffic. The FSHud dev doesn’t pay for data and used the FSLTL injector. That’s a liability for the FSLTL project, as they have an agreement with FR24 (FSHud is payware, whereas FSLTL is free). In order to use live traffic data you have to pay, otherwise the data provider can easily shut down your project.

$192 per year is too much for the average user. I guess the price of AI usage will go down eventually, but in the meantime - it’s too expensive. I hope Asobo will implement something similar in the future (better ATC, voice support etc.). Their flight plan tool (which is replacing a Navigraph sub) was apparently the first step towards a better ATC system