I need to know if I am missing anything else that would make the sim BETTER than it ALREADY have obtained. Any suggestions must be validated as loading up the below mention programs make me feel like real flight planning. It takes about 15 minutes just to get to starting FS9.1. It is worth it but one more thing must be important to add to the time already.Ulimate Terrain depending on night or dayActiveSky 6.5 the rest of the programs need itGround Pro II based on weather conditionsREX 2004 Extreme last but not least WOOOWWW!!Carl Perry 7+ year sim pilot

Mesh.

Mesh.

OPps Forgot to mention FSGensis. I had it before all the rest. The Whole world.Carl Perry 7+ year sim pilot

FSUIPC full version ;)

Flight Keeper and Radar Contact would add a lot.Al

do you have add-on planes and airports?

FSUIPC full version ;)

Is wind smoothing the only thing I am getting that the normal simmer uses? Straight answer why?Carl Perry 7 + year sim pilot

Flight Keeper and Radar Contact would add a lot.Al

Looked at Radar contact. Your one good reason you like it.Carl Perry 7+ year sim pilot

do you have add-on planes and airports?

Every plane and airport except PMDG 737NG FOR FS9. only plane missing in the hanger. Oh forgot about Airbus 320 ADVANCE onlyCarl Perry 7+ year sim pilot

Advantages of a registered version of FSUIPC? Have a look here:http://secure.simmarket.com/pete-dowson-fsuipc3.phtml

"MY World" landclass for whole world...and you good to go.

Consider FSBuild for a flight planner. It interfaces with AS6.5 gettings winds aloft for better fuel planning. I'm attaching a navlog from FSBuild 2.3 with weather fetched from Active Sky.

I agree with all the above.I use the same setup as you (except ASE instead of AS6.5 - it gives much better cloud layers compared to AS6.5, much, much better turbulence effects and it sorts out low level vs high level visibility).I can also highly recommend Radar Contact (I am a real life ATCO, and it is the most realistic of them all). It really adds some real world realism.FS Build is great for flight planning, gives a very realistic navlog/load sheet, and has a great online planner linked in to it, where you need but put in your departure and destination airports, and it comes up with a real world route. It also exports the flightplans to all needed formats (including most good addon aircraft's FMS). It also links in the AS6.5/ASA/ASE winds to adjust flight times and fuel burn.Finally, if you want more realism than most people can handle, get Leonardo's Maddog 2008 Pro. It takes a while to get into, but when you have mastered it and purchased the Brilliant voice activated FS2Crew to go with it, you will be blown away!Neil

I agree with all the above.I use the same setup as you (except ASE instead of AS6.5 - it gives much better cloud layers compared to AS6.5, much, much better turbulence effects and it sorts out low level vs high level visibility).I can also highly recommend Radar Contact (I am a real life ATCO, and it is the most realistic of them all). It really adds some real world realism.FS Build is great for flight planning, gives a very realistic navlog/load sheet, and has a great online planner linked in to it, where you need but put in your departure and destination airports, and it comes up with a real world route. It also exports the flightplans to all needed formats (including most good addon aircraft's FMS). It also links in the AS6.5/ASA/ASE winds to adjust flight times and fuel burn.Finally, if you want more realism than most people can handle, get Leonardo's Maddog 2008 Pro. It takes a while to get into, but when you have mastered it and purchased the Brilliant voice activated FS2Crew to go with it, you will be blown away!Neil

Now you all know I already have the Maddog 2008 Pro Only fly it when I have time to be real serious. This is not a plane to play with. Radar Contact sounds good. I like your comment about it. Flight plans is not a problem I have to many sources for that. Heard about problems with ASE.CArl Perry 7+ year sim pilot