Looks like they just posted some pic's and an update. http://www.flightsimlabs.com/

After reading the update, it sounds like this will be extremely realistic. This is no surprise though considering how realistic the Concorde-X is.

Every news is good news there. Since they are not on the tease and please trip, they only post things if something has to be told. I like this calm policy, although it might distract some guys being upset well above the limits when receiving their monthly screenshot feed ("wow, she even has engines!") from other projects. If that's a new trend to build the addon planes with multicrew ability from the scratch and also some FMGS database using the full ARINC 424-19 protocol specifications I really like it. Sounds like e. g. DME Arcs can then be shown and flown, without needing to trick that flight sim FMC and stretching requirements.I hope that Navigraph can deliver this data then, but this would be a small concern of course, since now we are awaiting a real evolution in flight sim Airbuses, don't we?But, from the text, it might take some time to come.

Another A320?? How many more 737's , A320's and 757's do we really need ? Why do so many developers insist on adding yet another of the same type....there are SO many interesting aircraft out there to be done properly. These three have to rank amongst the most boring. But I guess everyone is still buying them...

After two failed A320 attempts, I find it hard to be very excited. First I want to see it working well, then I'll see if I'll buy it. Of course, FSLabs already has a good product out there, so my expectations of FSLabs are higher.

How many more 737's , A320's and 757's do we really need ?

Uh, how many of top quality 737s, a320 or 757, are out there for FSX? I don't know about any.My biggest concern about it, is that at this speed they won't make it before MS Flight or other sim will take place of FSX. How long it took them to make Concorde, 3-4 years? There is a hell of a lot of code required to make proper Airbus systems simulation.

Uh, how many of top quality 737s, a320 or 757, are out there for FSX? I don't know about any.

+1

+1 !!

The Qualitywings 757 is a pretty decent model.

Wow, he´s got to be kidding... PSS A320 is the most realistic Airbus we ever had for FS, and that´s a FS2000/2002 product. We don´t consider simplifications of an aircraft to count as an aircraft covered by an Addon here, we just want the best, and I believe FSLabs can provide us with that

Another A320?? How many more 737's , A320's and 757's do we really need ? Why do so many developers insist on adding yet another of the same type....there are SO many interesting aircraft out there to be done properly. These three have to rank amongst the most boring. But I guess everyone is still buying them...

None of the planes you mention are decently modelled for FSX. There are a few good attempts (e.g. Quality Wings), but no PMDG-like quality aircraft (feel free to substitute PMDG with LDS or another top notch developer). So, why are you complaining?!Andreas