An overclocked LGA1366 chip hardly hits 15 - 16GB/s. What do you mean by reliabilty of SB? can you please link some of those threads?

Hi Dario, is the first result at 3.4GHZ and the second @4.8GHz, also what specification is the memory sticks?Mine at 4.5GHz 1333MHz

Hi Dario, is the first result at 3.4GHZ and the second @4.8GHz, also what specification is the memory sticks?Mine at 4.5GHz 1333MHz

Hi Gary Ok, I can see now that the power saving modes kicked in before I captured the screen in the first run at 1600 CL9. Both where with my regular FSX OC (4.8GHz HT off)Your results look normal, at 4.8GHz you would be close to 21GB/s. Give me a minute and I'll try it at 4.5GHz with different memory settings (2133 CL8, 1600 CL9 and 1333 C7) so you can compare

Interesting, CPU OC has zero impact in the results:

First one should've been this:

First one should've been this:

Was running slight memory OC, (2100), now back to stock, (2000), score went up to 17,500! Latency went down. Too many errors at 2100?K

First one should've been this:

I noticed test1 and test2 were the same above I was about to ask, thxs.Nice improvement at 2133 I wouldn't change my [email protected] for [email protected] though, not sure the extra bandwidth is used or needed.Some might call a .6ns change significant between your test3 and test4. They say a ns in the computer world is like an eternity.Thank you for running that for me Dario.

mineEdit: I did Memtest at 4.8, 5.2(1633) and 5.4GHz. I did not see a significant change in the scores

I have no idea what this test does, but here's mine just for fun. Normal priority if that matters.

What you want to aim at is getting the highest read write and copy numbers and the lowers latency number possible = pedal to the metal.The last one (latency) is the more important one for FSX.

What you want to aim at is getting the highest read write and copy numbers and the lowers latency number possible = pedal to the metal.The last one (latency) is the more important one for FSX.

And given that dual channel has better latency than tripple channel because there's less overhead, what would you recommend?

And given that dual channel has better latency than tripple channel because there's less overhead, what would you recommend?

Here is mine done with the trial version of AIDA64,

Here is mine done with the trial version of AIDA64,

That's cheating hehe. AIDA is not MaxxMem. So now try on dual channel and you'll see your latency improve. I know you won't, so here's mine (with higher CAS, 4 RAM sticks and 2T command rate):And some others who did:http://www.overclock...hannel-ram.html

OK! here it is, I can't tell you all my secrets......:P

OK! here it is, I can't tell you all my secrets......:P

like a wise man told me once, there's a newer version of MaxxMem. 1.50 ?!?!?!? C'mon Alain, try 1.95 :biggrin:So did you try on dual channel for better latency? I mean if it's so much better for FSX...

like a wise man told me once, there's a newer version of MaxxMem. 1.50 ?!?!?!? C'mon Alain, try 1.95 :biggrin:So did you try on dual channel for better latency? I mean if it's so much better for FSX...

Here without any major tweak..