November 13, 201114 yr When I save panel state, the NAV1 and NAV2 frequencies are not saved. Is it correct, or something wrong? Miroslav Murin
November 13, 201114 yr I notifed this too. After SP1 also the COM's and IRS selectors are not saved. The developers are saying that it is very difficult to implement because of the complexity.So we have to live with it I guess. Daniel Verhaal
November 13, 201114 yr Disapointing!!!Paying for those products and don't getting any quality.I truly hope you are being sarcastic! Daniel Verhaal
November 13, 201114 yr Nope at all!I'm a software developer, and I know exactly how those things works, and sucher symtomps "that's too complicated" show that quality of product is poor.Hopefully it will be better, but it's all matter of number of users.
November 13, 201114 yr Nope at all!I'm a software developer, and I know exactly how those things works, and sucher symtomps "that's too complicated" show that quality of product is poor.Hopefully it will be better, but it's all matter of number of users.Developer??? You can´t even spell right!/ Leffe Leif A Mikkelsen **********************
November 13, 201114 yr Developer??? You can´t even spell right!/ LeffeI don't see any relationship between spelling and development.Maybe you can explain?
November 13, 201114 yr Most users here are suffering from a fact that "Bugs" is normal, becouse you don't have any alternatives.But bravely releaseing SP1 (I'm talking about PMDG NGX) with critical bugs like deactivating LNAV during takeoffand panel states are not saved is a failure.All I'm trying to say with my miss-splelling language is that MSFS 3rd party addons development area is too poor becousethere is no much users.I have come from mobile applications development area, and I know that those symptoms are not happend becouse ofamount of users companies getting much more revenue and can allow larger QA teams.I don't even think that PMDG performs qualified QA on each build of their products, they must be taking outsourcers orworse of that volunteers.P. S. I hope Viking nation will forgive my miss-spelling mistakes.
November 13, 201114 yr Perhaps YOU should try your hand at developing a plane for FSX and deal with all the crap that FS throws at you. If you do, I'm available for hire for QA testing, but you cant afford me :-) Jay
November 14, 201114 yr Perhaps YOU should try your hand at developing a plane for FSX and deal with all the crap that FS throws at you. If you do, I'm available for hire for QA testing, but you cant afford me :-)You are too sarcastic, unfortenately....Although, I did have an experience of developing FSX software, FS Web Communicator, a freeware software, I stopped to support it becouse didn't have a time."deal with all the crap that FS throws at you" - believe me it happends on all systems, I'm familiar with simconnect API and it's a toy joy against old mobile devicesdevelopment like j2me or BREW.The problem is not a difficulty, the problem is a revenue, I'm sure if FS Community had much more users and sales of FS Addons could bring ~100K$, such answers like"it's too complicated" was never appear and each version was atomicaly brilliant.I definately can help PMDG dev team in my free time as well.
November 14, 201114 yr Disapointing!!!Paying for those products and don't getting any quality.ohhh please.....you hang on one little minor thing totally overlooking at most of the wonderful things it has to offer. Joel Strikovsky
November 14, 201114 yr Most users here are suffering from a fact that "Bugs" is normal, becouse you don't have any alternatives.ohh yeah! there are alternatives.... go to the other 737NG vendor.no one forcing you to use the PMDG products.stating such reckless statement without much thinking, sounds to me like.....I prefer not saying, sorry."If you would given a pile of gold, you would probably complain it was to heavy" Joel Strikovsky
November 14, 201114 yr ohh yeah! there are alternatives.... go to the other 737NG vendor.no one forcing you to use the PMDG products.stating such reckless statement without much thinking, sounds to me like.....I prefer not saying, sorry."If you would given a pile of gold, you would probably complain it was to heavy" PMDG products are wonderfull according level of realism, content and level of details they offer, I'm talking about written code aspect, just hopefully want it better.
November 14, 201114 yr PMDG products are wonderfull according level of realism, content and level of details they offer, I'm talking about written code aspect, just hopefully want it better.that is better positive approach...was it really necessary all that negativity before to make your point? Joel Strikovsky
Create an account or sign in to comment