June 16, 201213 yr Hi, Im upgrading my system and my buddy hooked me up with a MSI P55-GD65 motherboard that has a built in 8-channel 7.1 HD Audio subsystem with S/PDIF out. On my older system I had a Creative SB Audigy 2 Sound card. Should I use this card on my upgrade to free up the CPU from working the sounds, or is the built in sound system on the mobo just a better system and I should use that one with no sound card installed? Asus Tuf Gaming Plus B550 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D - Asus GeForce 4080 RTX OC Edition - 64GB DDR4 (3600Mhz) - EVGA 850W Power Supply - 2X 1 TB NVME PCIE gen 4 - Windows 11 (25H2)
June 16, 201213 yr Gone are the days when having on board sound meant compromising resources. The on board sound on my motherboard is indistinguishable from my previous Creative X-Fi Extreme and it uses Creative software anyway. I would never go back to having a separate sound card now. 9950X3D - X870E Aorus Master- TUF 5090 OC - 64GB DDR5 - 1500W HXi - Titan 360 RX LCD - 9100 Pro x 2 - LG 45GX950A - HOTAS Warthog with Ava Base
June 16, 201213 yr Author Thanks for the reply Asus Tuf Gaming Plus B550 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D - Asus GeForce 4080 RTX OC Edition - 64GB DDR4 (3600Mhz) - EVGA 850W Power Supply - 2X 1 TB NVME PCIE gen 4 - Windows 11 (25H2)
June 18, 201213 yr I'd leave them both if You can - one for environment (the better-sound-output-card should be used for this) playback, one for ATC (the crappy one). Nowadays sound cards have their own CPUs to decode the bits to membrane movement. Bartłomiej Ender
June 19, 201213 yr I assume you propose running a separate program for ATC, otherwise how would you go about separating the audio being generated by a single application? Meaning, when you assign audio streams to different speaker outputs, you need separate applications that create the source audio streams. Anyway, built-in audio is good enough for 99% of uses and 99% of people. It's really only audiophiles and professionals that can 1) tell the difference 2) might have a use for something better than onboard audio
June 20, 201213 yr I assume you propose running a separate program for ATC, otherwise how would you go about separating the audio being generated by a single application? In application's GUI. Under settings/sounds You can pick which sound card You wish to playback the output (sounds and communications enables You to choose two cards) Bartłomiej Ender
June 20, 201213 yr Should I use this card on my upgrade to free up the CPU from working the sounds Hello If you are sticking with XP then either option will be fine but the Creative card will use less resources on XP. If you are moving to W7 then the Creative card will be no better than the onboard as W7 does not support hardware sound acceleration for Directsound, in that case use the onboard, your PC will thank you.
June 20, 201213 yr Author Yes, Im going from XP to Win7 64bit Asus Tuf Gaming Plus B550 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D - Asus GeForce 4080 RTX OC Edition - 64GB DDR4 (3600Mhz) - EVGA 850W Power Supply - 2X 1 TB NVME PCIE gen 4 - Windows 11 (25H2)
June 20, 201213 yr Yes, Im going from XP to Win7 64bit Hello Then the onboard will be fine, and a lot more stable than Creatives drivers
June 20, 201213 yr I'd leave them both if You can - one for environment (the better-sound-output-card should be used for this) playback, one for ATC (the crappy one). Nowadays sound cards have their own CPUs to decode the bits to membrane movement. I suggest a cheap USB option. I recently picked up a Creative X-Fi dongle for $30 and it is wonderful. No more card, better airflow, and less surface area for dust accumulation in my rig. Plus I can use it on my laptop which has a sub par sound solution. Besides, many modern motherboards have a separate front panel header that can make your scenario possible without a discreet card. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver -- Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell Avsim ToS Avsim Screenshot Rules
Create an account or sign in to comment