January 29, 201313 yr Hi again! I recently bought a Gigabyte Radeon HD 7750 for my PC and FS2004. But I am not quite satisfied with it; performance is average in my opinion. So, could anyone give me tips about a possibly better card performancewise in a $125 to $200 price range? My setup: Intel 3,4 GHZ, 4GB RAM, ASUS Motherboard PCIExpress. Grateful for tips. Thanks! Hans Hermansson Sweden
January 29, 201313 yr <strong class='bbc'>This is an automatic message.</strong><br /><br />This topic has been moved from "The FS2004 (FS9) Forum" to "MOBO, RAM, CPU's & Other Hardware". This move has been done for a number of possible reasons.<ul class='bbc'><br /><li>The most likely reason is that the post was off topic.<br /></li><li>The topic could also have contained images or a video that were not appropriate to the original forum it was posted in.<br /></li><li>The images might not have been "illustrative" or "explanatory" in nature.<br /></li><li>The topic could have been moved because we deemed it to be more appropriately placed elsewhere.<br /></li></ul><br />Please ensure that your posts are "on topic" and contain illustrative images or videos as appropriate. Do not post videos or images just for entertainment purposes anywhere but in the screen shot or video forums.<br /><br />Members who continue to post off topic posts can be denied entry to specific forums in order to reduce and remove the practice. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Chase My 2017 Build: Liquid Cooled i7 7700K CPU idle @ 4.2GHz | MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X 8G | 16GB's DDR4 4000 RAM | ASUS 27" 144hz Gaming Monitor | MSI Z270 M7 Motherboard | Windows 10 | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 500GB SSD
January 29, 201313 yr Hans ... FS9 was designed in 2003/2004. It runs fine with graphic cards of the time and with XP, the OS of the time. Unlike FSX it is unlikely you will see much difference in the visual quality or performance with modern alternatives. The exception being the higher settings of Antialiasing and Anisotropic Filtering permitted with todays equipment. If you are dissatisfied with your Radeon perhaps you need to revise its settings. Do not, however, set AA within FS9. Early Radeons had difficulty rendering clouds in FS9 and as a consequence many simmers decided to support nVidea and most recommendations by 'gurus' usually discuss preferred settings for that range of cards.
January 29, 201313 yr I still think a newer video card, used with nvidia inspector, can work well for fs9. Something like a gts 650 or 660 would do good things. It would do well especially if the user cranks up the AA settings. These especially with a larger resolution monitor will make FS9 look smooth with no jaggies. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
January 29, 201313 yr The HD7750 was a rather low end entry level card as it was, I wouldn't have expected too much from it. In that price range I'd look at the GTX 660 or 650Ti. i7-13700KF, 32gb DDR4 3200, RTX 4080, Win 11, MSFS 2024
January 29, 201313 yr Author Hi again! and thanks for advice. Got your latest replies and I think I found a good alternative video card: Gigabyte Geforce GTX 650TI, which I ordered today. Seems pretty much in line with your views. So, let's hope I get a little better performance. Thanks again! Hansinsweden
January 29, 201313 yr The HD7750 was a rather low end entry level card as it was, I wouldn't have expected too much from it. In that price range I'd look at the GTX 660 or 650Ti. Pretty good card fly in stereo 3d with it in FSX and FS2004. Not the top of the shelf, but it still better than using the default video card attached to your mobo. Got 650 Gtx its similar to 7750hd overall.
Create an account or sign in to comment