August 1, 201312 yr If anything IAF747 is contributing to the hobby, not "forcing". Kevinh makes a valid point regarding regulation within the hobby, however, this seems unrelated. As Kevinh mentioned, there are va's that have similar systems in place - this hobby is open to interpretation and improvement. If IAF747 wants to produce and promote realworld abnormal scenarios in the form of standardized training and testing, more power to him. If someone wants to sign up, okay, if not, thats okay as well. I think its great to be creative. Some people like taking off and engaging the autopilot at 500 feet and waiting for 14 hours just to watch an auto landing. Others would rather fly a single engine- partial panel approach (if thats possible on an addon) down to minimums. Whatever floats your boat, its a computer simulator -sam i7-7700K | GTX 1080 | Asus TUF Mark I | G.Skill Trident Z DDR4 16GB | Samsung 960 M.2 Evo 1 TB | Corsair H105 | EVGA 850 | NZXT H440
August 2, 201312 yr Others would rather fly a single engine- partial panel approach (if thats possible on an addon) down to minimums. I have had to fly an approach on standby instruments. It was a marvelous experience (only I really could use the copilot at that point - don't have FS2Crew) --Peter Fabian
Create an account or sign in to comment