PMDG 787 Dreamliner some day?

[mchavezv 6]

Do you think some day we will be flight this amazing bird?

 

Interesting question

[Handle 18]

I think you people that post this month after month are in some kind of cult. Anywho...Because you don't come off as someone with the knowledge of the search function, here..http://qwsim.com/index.php/787-overview  

[mganz121 159]

I think you people that post this month after month are in some kind of cult. Anywho...Because you don't come off as someone with the knowledge of the search function, here..http://qwsim.com/index.php/787-overview

Damn Tapatalk .... I must have wandered into the PMDG forum !

 

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

 

 

[mchavezv 6]

month after month are in some kind of cult

 

lol

[cmpbellsjc 2,963]

I think you people that post this month after month are in some kind of cult. Anywho...Because you don't come off as someone with the knowledge of the search function, here..http://qwsim.com/index.php/787-overview

Lol, its true. Search must be the most under used feature of Avsim. They should just remove it since it doesn't appear to be used very often.

 

Jim Burke

[scandinavian13 5,192]

As much as I like the idea, it gets old when it comes up over and over again:

 

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/416532-why-not-a-787-from-pmdg/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/393440-boeing-787-in-pmdgs-future/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/384833-b-787/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/385062-boeing-787/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/351317-777-or-787/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/355176-boeing-787-try-it/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/340970-it-wouls-be-cool-if-pmdg-did-a-787/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/265330-pmdg-787-dreamliner/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/289204-boeing-787-9/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/270132-please-create-a-boeing-787/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/124156-dreamliner-787-do-it-pmdg/

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/116609-i-hope-the-787-is-next/

 

...and those are just the threads with "787" in the title related to asking PMDG to do it...

 

Cue the outrage, and people suggesting I'm mean-spirited, a jerk, and clearly don't support discussion in a forum.  Because, let's be honest, forums are only for recycling the same banter that we've already discussed, right?  Isn't that the normal rhetoric against reading manuals and using the search function?

 

 

 

Anyway, as mentioned in all of those threads:

PMDG has quite a development schedule already.  Even if they wanted to work on a 787, it would be a while before it hit the market.

[Don t moderate me this way 882]

Looks like I'll have to stick to my weather-radar-equipped PMDG A380 for a while!  

[Q_flyer 766]

Looks like I'll have to stick to my weather-radar-equipped PMDG A380 for a while!  

 

:lol:

 

Actually, the QualityWings 787 looks rather darn nice, so perhaps they can cover the 787 ground for us, and PMDG can get on with the most anticipated, and important forthcoming release:  the DC-6 of course.   :ph34r:

 

:smile:

 

#What747?

[mchavezv 6]

 

Actually, the QualityWings 787 looks rather darn nice, so perhaps they can cover the 787 ground for us

 

Did you have chance to check if the Qualitywings aircrafts are ok? I mean worth it?

 

[Jordan.Warner 5]

I do indeed think that they will, within the next 5 years or so. From what I have heard from my fellows at my Java office, they will next be making the B767-200/300 base package. After that, B787-800/900 Package. And so on and so fourth. But yes, Indeed they should make newer planes first, due to the popularity of them!

[knukles 18]

767-300 !

[Groovin_DC-10 50]

 

[UAE77W 16]

I do indeed think that they will, within the next 5 years or so. From what I have heard from my fellows at my Java office, they will next be making the B767-200/300 base package.

 

How I wish it were true. The 767-300 looks so awesome with winglets.  B)

[Nathan3219 113]

Awesome! The daily PMDG request thread.

 

I'll add my vote as well for the 767.

[MatthewL 16]

The Abacus 787 is the best payware aircraft period. Better than the NGX.