And what about AI traffic? Why nobody mention it? For me this is vital realism portion. If P3d cannot correctly handle UT2 it's no for me at the moment.

And what about AI traffic? Why nobody mention it? For me this is vital realism portion. If P3d cannot correctly handle UT2 it's no for me at the moment.

 

UT2 traffic works fine in P3D.  If you have UT2 installed in FSX there is no need to install it in P3D if you only want the same options and traffic as FSX.  Just add the necessary entries to the required file.  Search the AI Traffic forum to see how.

Wow, that's pretty funny. A massive assumption, of course, and untrue most certainly. Could you speak of your own experiences and let others speak of theirs? Without the judgement?

 

Here's mine:

1) P3Dv2.2: love it. 

2) FSX: still pretty good and I use it one or twice a week.

3) XPX: Use it once a month...for a short while...always.

 

 

Agreed P3D is the future. Those instulting it just dont know what they are talking. For years you all moaned about wanting an updated and fixed fsx with an active development team! YOUR WISH HAS BEEN GRANTED FOOLS. It may be based on old code, but their mission is to take that old code and move it into our decade with dx11 and 64 bit(YES P3D IS GOING 64 BIT estimated end of 2014 or early 2015 they are try to sort some other thing out first). The sim is being made by LOCKHEED! These guys manufacture planes, hired most of the ACES team (dudes that made fsx) and have millions to invest into the sim. Not only that, they listen to us fsx users on their forums on what to add in future updates and pay attention to us unlike microsoft who just wanted money. OUR WISHES HAVE BEEN GRANTED WHAT MORE COULD YOU WANT. be patient its still in development and they are trying to bring *fsx* to the future for you dudes! The only drawback is that its expensive (unless you qualify for academic license) and some addons (especially  those that use real licensed data from real aircraft such as PMDG) will cost more. bottom line: YOU WANTED A NEW *FSX*, here it is stop complaining, THEY ONLY JUST GOT THE BALL ROLLING

Well yes, PMDG would be paying Boeing a licensee fee, but not Lockheed-Martin, just as Eaglesoft has to pay Textron for their Cessna and Beechcraft products.

 

I don't support the concept of charging a different cost based on the user's use of the product, but it is well within any company's right to do so. I will vote with my wallet in such cases.

Its a commerical simulator as those involve customers with lots of cash (airlines, schools, etc) it costs more-FACT. PMDG is using licensed data from Boeing in a commercial sim and Boeing is going to charge them more, Therefore we are gonna get charged more plus LM is a competitor Boeing will be trying to get a nice slice of the pie too

For years you all moaned about wanting an updated and fixed fsx with an active development team! YOUR WISH HAS BEEN GRANTED FOOLS

 

Whoa, settle down captain happy.

Agreed P3D is the future. Those instulting it just dont know what they are talking. For years you all moaned about wanting an updated and fixed fsx with an active development team! YOUR WISH HAS BEEN GRANTED FOOLS. It may be based on old code, but their mission is to take that old code and move it into our decade with dx11 and 64 bit(YES P3D IS GOING 64 BIT estimated end of 2014 or early 2015 they are try to sort some other thing out first). The sim is being made by LOCKHEED! These guys manufacture planes, hired most of the ACES team (dudes that made fsx) and have millions to invest into the sim. Not only that, they listen to us fsx users on their forums on what to add in future updates and pay attention to us unlike microsoft who just wanted money. OUR WISHES HAVE BEEN GRANTED WHAT MORE COULD YOU WANT. be patient its still in development and they are trying to bring *fsx* to the future for you dudes! The only drawback is that its expensive (unless you qualify for academic license) and some addons (especially  those that use real licensed data from real aircraft such as PMDG) will cost more. bottom line: YOU WANTED A NEW *FSX*, here it is stop complaining, THEY ONLY JUST GOT THE BALL ROLLING

Its a commerical simulator as those involve customers with lots of cash (airlines, schools, etc) it costs more-FACT. PMDG is using licensed data from Boeing in a commercial sim and Boeing is going to charge them more, Therefore we are gonna get charged more plus LM is a competitor Boeing will be trying to get a nice slice of the pie too

 

You posted in the wrong thread, and it appears you posted the same thing but slightly different wording that was acutally your response to that PDMG thread.