June 30, 20169 yr That's quite extreme. I think I'd rather stop simming if that was the only option I had. I was marginally in agreement until the 'no addon airports' bit. What's the point then? You run a tough regime Bob I like flying. I do that in the sky not at airports.
June 30, 20169 yr I like flying. I do that in the sky not at airports. RIMSHOT! lol Bob made a good point though, we use flight sims to fly, BUT at the same time, there are a lot of folks out there, myself included, who want to experience the whole gambit of flight ops, from start to finish (ex. GSX, Radar Contact), so with that said, having a good detailed airport to fly from and to is desired. It's a double-edged sword I'm afraid. We want all the realism we can cram into the sim to make it as close to real life as possible, but we also don't want the OOMs, crashes and bad performance. Striking that perfect balance seems to take the most work for simming. Engage, research, inform and make your posts count! -Jim Morvay Origin EON-17SLX - Under the hood: Intel Core i7 7700K at 4.2GHz (Base) 4.6GHz (overclock), nVidia GeForce GTX-1080 Pascal w/8gb vram, 32gb (2x16) Crucial 2400mhz RAM, 3840 x 2160 17.3" IPS w/G-SYNC, Samsung 950 EVO 256GB PCIe m.2 SSD (Primary), Samsung 850 EVO 500gb M.2 (Sim Drive), MS Windows 10 Professional 64-Bit
June 30, 20169 yr Striking that perfect balance seems to take the most work for simming. Agree that is the trick. I don't disagree with Bob either really - I understand his point. I don't have to like it though.
Create an account or sign in to comment