Sign in to follow this  
Sesquashtoo

AeroFly'in...

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

very nice shots, thanks for posting Mitch! to what levels are systems simulated? I don't believe there is anything close to PMDG level right? Do you guys know if there is anything at the "study level sim" on the horizon? 

Thanks!

John.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice shots, thanks for posting Mitch! to what levels are systems simulated? I don't believe there is anything close to PMDG level right? Do you guys know if there is anything at the "study level sim" on the horizon?

Thanks!

John.

Right now systems are basic. To give you an idea: none of the planes can be started or shutdown (although there is a file somewhere that enables this for the Cessna). Most of the buttons don't work. This sim is meant to quickly get into a plane with engines running and simply fly. There is an autopilot in various planes but, like in the Airbus, it follows the basic plan the sim can create, no SID, no STAR, no FMS with all kinds of pages to fiddle with. The sim is really geared towards the flying itself. You can find various video's on YouTube showing flights with the Boeing and Airbus which will give you an idea of what can be done. (Take note though that a lot of those video's are made by newbies who don't have a clue what they are doing LOL so don't blame some stupid things on the devs of AFS2. ;) )

 

The devs themselves clearly won't add study level sim material: it all depends on support from 3rd party developers, just like with other sims, but afaik right now there aren't any airplane developers who said they will create something for this sim. (They also can't because the SDK for planes hasn't been released yet.) Only Orbx announced to work on the scenery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice shots, thanks for posting Mitch! to what levels are systems simulated? I don't believe there is anything close to PMDG level right? Do you guys know if there is anything at the "study level sim" on the horizon? 

Thanks!

John.

Hi John,

 

Because this is an early-release (another name for Beta release), it is like XP 11 right now.  Most planes have enough activated for general flight and navigation.  Other systems, are textured, but not active on a plane-by-plane basis.  This sim COMES with 17 planes...from commercial, G.A. and fighter aircraft.  They are all flyable...controllable, but again, not every system is active.

 

As I wrote recently on thread in the Hangar Chat Forum, this is truly a sim that doesn't need to compete head-on with sims such as FSX,P3D, or XP.   This is a sim for the flyer that wants to see REALLY, what is below the wing in real life.  Many members on the Steam forum, have said that they have actually flown over their own house!

 

I have been flying it for about two days straight...and John, the sim is stunning in all areas of endeavor.   How I label this sim now, is simply this. It is a premier VFR flight simulator.  If you like to look outside your cockpit, instead of for the most part, straight ahead at the instrument panel,....and want real-world fidelity, then this sim is an ADDITION, not a COMPETITION, to all your other flight sim platforms.  Want to fly a study flight?  Fire up P3D, FSX, or XP (whatever).  Want to take her for a flight to explore, to let down your shoulders, to view, enjoy, and relax?  Start up, AeroFly FS-2.

 

The sim has world-wide ortho, with autogen placed upon the terrain, where the Dev's have decided for now...lots upon the DLC regions and interests.  So, you don't just have 'flat' buildings in the ortho maps. You have true 3D buildings where they have been placed.   

 

If you are a commercial flyer, you can take a flight with the big iron, and set your navigation nav aid, by nav aid, as you build your flight plan. Then for say, (as I have already done), take off out of Kennedy, and then head to Oakland  totally across the continent, and not ever see the same fake-computer generated tile, or mismatched clashing tiles.  At the FL's...the scenery is real- world and life like below you.  Take the trip across the continent, and then shoot the final at 120 FPS!  What a rush!

 

This is a work in progress...but as it stands now...it is a most recommended download and DLC content purchase.

 

Orbx has already ported over (in house tweaking going on)  Chicago Meigs...and oh wow...you should see it resting in this virtual reality sim.   VR..is going to be the strong suit...and VIVE is very well supported already.  I don't have VR, so, on my normal 2D screen, the sim is a knock out.  It has features that only recently, have P3D and XP (in lighting upon the aircraft bodies...reflections of such) have been added. The sun..and light depth, is better in this sim, than any other right now. You 'feel' the heat of the sun, the shadows are most excellent, and because this sim renders so well...it is dead smooth in animation, including shadows playing across the plane, panel, interior...etc.

 

You own this sim for an hour, and you lose yourself in it.

 

The biggest note to take away from my post, John...is that this is NOT a competition for either/or...of FSX,P3D, or XP10/11....no..rather, this is a beautiful, and most powerful VFR flight simulator to ADD to your flight sim pervue.  If people approach it as another 'specialized' for VFR flight simulator, they will without doubt enjoy it...use if for its own, unique strengths, and not get their panties in a knot, over being constantly compared to what they already have with P3D, FSX, or XP11. If you require a study-depth flight...then you already own that...FSX/P3D/XP11.  What you don't have, with the aforementioned, is world-wide veritus terrain, with highly detailed of same, in the DLC areas of content, that you don't have again, with FSX/P3D, or XP10/11,---- world-wide, and not requiring $$$ in 3rP content, to see what you get with the basic AeroFly FS v2 download.

 

This is an addition to a flight simulation enthusiast, that serves the VFR recreation, G.A. owner/flyer, so very well....with commercial and military jaunts, to boot!

 

My thoughts, anyway.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great shots Mitch. I have only seen pics in high detailed areas. I am curious, what do areas that are not in the HD areas look like. For instance, I believe you are from Michigan. Can you post a couple of pics from there? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great shots Mitch. I have only seen pics in high detailed areas. I am curious, what do areas that are not in the HD areas look like. For instance, I believe you are from Michigan. Can you post a couple of pics from there? Thanks.

Sure can, and I shall.  BTW, the shot of the right wing on the 737-500 (fourth shot down in my series above)...is about 200 miles west of the New York DLC barrier line. I was on my way to Oakland, California, of which is within a DLC content area.

 

That is the standard detail that you are seeing from FL280, below that right wing. That is not computer generated, but is actually what is down there at that x/y coordinate, in real life!  I think it looks great.  Anything over 3,500 ft anywhere, will make you think you are there!  I want to fly tomorrow around Mackinac Island (even though not DLC) and see what's up. I shoot that and other notables for you.

 

The bottom line though, is that I can fly anywhere in the world, even outside dedicated high-detail DLC content, and be satisfied for the flying from one DLC to another.  I will purchase the DLC's as they come, for they are quite reasonably priced for what you are getting, ....and you are getting sheer visual enjoyment, that is for certain!

 

Cheers,

 

Mitch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great shots Mitch. I have only seen pics in high detailed areas. I am curious, what do areas that are not in the HD areas look like. For instance, I believe you are from Michigan. Can you post a couple of pics from there? Thanks.

Just flew around the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.  While all water bodies and shorelines are there, unfortunately, the texture resolution is so low, unless you knew the area, and what should be below you, you could not make out any detail whatsoever. So, while you can fly from one DLC to another, over the `whole world`, just consider what is below you, as 'filler'.  You know land and water is there, but it is just a blurry collage, if anything else, at this time in early release.

 

If they do upgrade the whole world with a higher resolution that makes terrain and landmarks identifiable,  I'd be one to consider purchasing it.   This sim, make you feel, like you are really in the air...over real terrain (DLC, and higher bordering resolutions), and I have been for the most part this evening flying in the high resolution South West of the United States.  It was simply breath-taking, the realism of it all....

 

The immersion this sim develops, is about 300 out of 10!  You are really there...and at the whopping FPS generated, you are really in control of your aircraft.

 

This sim is a never-delete 'keeper'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just flew around the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. While all water bodies and shorelines are there, unfortunately, the texture resolution is so low, unless you knew the area, and what should be below you, you could not make out any detail whatsoever. So, while you can fly from one DLC to another, over the `whole world`, just consider what is below you, as 'filler'. You know land and water is there, but it is just a blurry collage, if anything else, at this time in early release.

 

What happened to "At the FL's...the scenery is real- world and life like below you" and "Anything over 3,500 ft anywhere, will make you think you are there!"...? I have seen screenshots of area's outside of detailed area's and really wondered what you were going on about. ;) This is exactly why I sometimes (as someone said) "rain on your parade": unbridled enthusiasm sometimes make people say things that aren't entirely correct and people simply need to be made aware of that. ;)

 

In the meantime my copy of AFS2 has yet to finish downloading: I had to lower download speeds because my family started complaining about wifi not working LOL. I hope to share some screenshots of my own somewhere this weekend.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone mentioned somewhere about IPACS considering worldwide coverage at 4.8 metres per pixel, which would be extremely welcome. They also stated that this would be around 160MB, but that is way too low. Does anyone know how much disk space would be required for the entire planet at that resolution? I guess the water would not need to be that detailed, so that eliminates 70% of the total surface area required!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What happened to "At the FL's...the scenery is real- world and life like below you" and "Anything over 3,500 ft anywhere, will make you think you are there!"...? I have seen screenshots of area's outside of detailed area's and really wondered what you were going on about. ;) This is exactly why I sometimes (as someone said) "rain on your parade": unbridled enthusiasm sometimes make people say things that aren't entirely correct and people simply need to be made aware of that. ;)

 

In the meantime my copy of AFS2 has yet to finish downloading: I had to lower download speeds because my family started complaining about wifi not working LOL. I hope to share some screenshots of my own somewhere this weekend.

That was about 200 miles outside of the DLC, when I typed that. So, the good coverage extends well past the DLC.  This was in nothern Michigan, where there is no DLC for hundreds of miles.  There is discussion with the Dev's of increasing this to total satisfactory viewing at about 160 gigs of content.  It will happen, sooner than later.

 

So, if you fly well beyond the DLC, you are still good to go. It doesn't just cut off to low-detail.  Jereon, there are thousands of square miles of VERY detailed scenery that will make your eye's pop. I can wait until Michigan starts getting some detailed DLC, or the world gets upgraded to a better general resolution. No problem whatsoever.  It would take you months/years as it is, to fully explore the South West and other DLC already for downloading.

 

:)

Someone mentioned somewhere about IPACS considering worldwide coverage at 4.8 metres per pixel, which would be extremely welcome. They also stated that this would be around 160MB, but that is way too low. Does anyone know how much disk space would be required for the entire planet at that resolution? I guess the water would not need to be that detailed, so that eliminates 70% of the total surface area required!

I wondering that myself, but no matter how large...I am really hooked on the entire world as Ortho for this sim. I flew a mind blowing flight of hours yesterday around the South West of the U.S.   The detail was incredible, the immersion was the best I have ever flown in a flight simulator. The FPS made it a sheer joy to run, so...no matter if the view is less than stellar outside of the DLC and a few hundred miles beyond their borders...I simply don't care that much.  I have other paid-for sims, that can cover those areas, until AF 2 brings those areas up to viewmanship.  This sim is fabulous for my needs.  It is a great addition to FSX, P3D, and XP11.  The aforementioned does not make it a redundant acquisition.  Oh..and I never have 'unbridled' enthusiasm. I only have enthusiasm. My level of enthusiasm....   :hi: ...and for most things that interest me. Music, and the instruments I play to make it, to listen to it, wood-carving-general wood working, writing, motorcycling, camping, kayaking, etc...etc...what you see in this forum, is just 'me', in all life endeavors.  Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loaded it briefly to set up the various options, but I will need to test those to make sure that (for example) the hat switch on my joystick works properly. However, I noted that flights can be set up for final approach at any runway for all of the airports in the database. That is a really nice touch, and I suspect that this will be my first experience of flight in the simulator. I love messing about doing take offs and landings, so this is right up my street. The fact that the south western USA region is a much, much bigger area than the San Francisco high resolution region in FU3/FU2 just makes it even better!  :smile: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jereon, there are thousands of square miles of VERY detailed scenery that will make your eye's pop.

Well, I just flew around in Switzerland and New York, in the er...detailed parts, and er... yes, it made my eyes pop but not in the way you meant it. Man, did my eyes pop...! I mean, seriously... really, seriously... I mean... SERIOUSLY... er... well, you know what, I will leave it at this or I might get banned. I won't even upload screenshots. I am happy, honestly, for everyone who likes AFS2 but it isn't a sim for me. To each his own. Happy flying! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loaded it briefly to set up the various options, but I will need to test those to make sure that (for example) the hat switch on my joystick works properly. However, I noted that flights can be set up for final approach at any runway for all of the airports in the database. That is a really nice touch, and I suspect that this will be my first experience of flight in the simulator. I love messing about doing take offs and landings, so this is right up my street. The fact that the south western USA region is a much, much bigger area than the San Francisco high resolution region in FU3/FU2 just makes it even better!  :smile:

Chris, I say this;

 

Set up a flight in the King Air, and create navigation between San Diego, and Roger's Field, near Lassen Peak.

 

Set up for a flight of FL180 at 200 knots.   Use the green box navigation aids for the entire flight.  Keep right through them.

 

I have found my sim;

 

I have never felt in any other sim, that I was....***actually*** flying.  Flying over the real world.  I have found my sim;

 

This flight, with the sun beaming down upon the fuselage, the wings, the haze...you can feel the warmth of the sun...the best light scattering I have ever seen in an simulated atmosphere, the clouds changing, and you don't even SEE them doing so....the best quite frankly, that I have seen in any flight simulator.  The scenery...well...you are there.  You are really flying over Sacremento, over the valley, on toward's Lassen Peak, and the right swing down through the mountains to a landing at Roger's Field, to the right of the lake, in those mountains.

 

The terrain (ortho) and so veritus

The atmospherics

 

The incredible control I have at my locked 60 FPS CONSTANT!

 

The sound of the King Air's props as they brrrr..and bite the air when the wind changes to a head wind,

 

I have found my sim;

 

I deleted P3D v2.4 yesterday, and formatted one of my Velociraptors just for this sim, and the anticipation of any further new releases of DLC content, or, hopefully, a build up of the entire North America, Central America, and South America.  I will CERTAINLY be investing in any of the aforementioned, if and when they come.

 

I realize now,that I am a VFR flyer. Totally. Not a 'study sim' flyer. I want to see the 'real world' out there, and I now realize that this is the sim platform that is custom tailored to my wants and needs.  I want to feel like I am really flying a plane over the real world.  I will never do this in real life..and so craved this in flight simulation.  P3D, FSX, XP(x), can not give you that. You, no matter what, see computer generated terrain, land features, colors, etc.  World-wide ortho lets you fly over what is there.  I really don't care if the world is a 'snap shot' of what was there when it was all formatted.  So what, if it is Ground Hog Day below the wing.  What is there, is damn gorgeous, and sets the mind up, that you are really doing 200 knots over the real world, over real cities, towns, lakes, mountains, and that is what I need for my sim'ming endeavors.

 

Each to their own, of course, the study flyer, the casual VFR/Study flyer.  I now know why I loved Flight Unlimited so much. It made me feel that I was OVER San Francisco, Oakland, Sonoma...etc.  Places I haunt in real life.

 

Folks,  If you liked that sort of flying...that visualization, then AeroFly FS-2 is Flight Unlimted 2, on serious STEROIDS, with a modern, and capable, graphics engine!

 

This is a specialized sim, for VFR and recreational flyers.   Most of us on AVSIM, already have FSX, P3D (whatever), XP (whatever)...and can fly study flights anytime.  You can not fly virtual reality flights with any of them, at present. You know that what is below you, is being graphically represented as what might be down there.  With AeroFly, you are seeing what is there...no matter a snap-shot in time, or otherwise. 

 

Final few words, and I'm going back to another flight.  This sim is a great addition to what you already have, because it doesn't 'duplicate' already what you have.  You don't have a sim that is based totally upon Ortho (actual real world view), even if at the present area's outside of dedicated DLC content is low rez.  The engine is there to bring where ever DLC comes, to full and true visual fidelity. What is there...will be there....

 

Like I said, I have dedicated upon my system, an entire hard drive to this platform, for I anticipate amazing contributions by Orbx, and other third party.  I realize, now, that I prefer Ortho below the wing...but to date, had nothing to compare to computer-generated auto-gen, and land texture tiles, other than FU-2 of which I had mostly forgotten the visual cue thereof.

 

Each to their own...each will persue their needs and what is important to them, for the sim to have, in features, and visual cues.

 

For myself, I have found my sim. I now only anticipate with excitement, to see it mature, see more content from IPACS, as well as any contributing partners. I have an entire hard drive waiting for what comes next.  Until then...I have months of flight enjoyment right now...with Southwest U.S., Northeast U.S., and New York and sq miles of area surrounding.

 

Life is good...and sim'ming just got way better, from two days ago!  Water bodies are real, Canyons are real. Gullies are real, valleys (Sacramento) is real 'down there'...

 

My recent flight set up between San Diego, and Roger's Field, near Lassen Peak...told me, "I'm home!"

 

Cheers, all, from an un-bridled, and unapologetic flight sim enthusiast!   Happy New Year to all!

 

Mitch

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone mentioned somewhere about IPACS considering worldwide coverage at 4.8 metres per pixel, which would be extremely welcome. They also stated that this would be around 160MB, but that is way too low. Does anyone know how much disk space would be required for the entire planet at that resolution? I guess the water would not need to be that detailed, so that eliminates 70% of the total surface area required!

 

I'm wondering at the context of that quote. To be exact, since JV says the Aerofly focus of interest, at least for now, is North America and Europe, maybe they were speaking about enhancing those specific areas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

North America and Europe at 4.8 metres per pixel would be fine for me. In fact, I would bump it up to 2.4 metres per pixel if they asked me! Obviously all areas around airports and detailed cities need to be at least 1.2 metres per pixel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bush flying ?

Depends a little on what you mean with bush flying. Actual bush area's have been modeled. The water isn't water so that isn't an option (when I think about bush flying I often think about floats...).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends a little on what you mean with bush flying. Actual bush area's have been modeled. The water isn't water so that isn't an option (when I think about bush flying I often think about floats...).

 

I consider landing on dirt strips and I feel XPlane offers the best in bush flying . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I consider landing on dirt strips and I feel XPlane offers the best in bush flying . 

 

Afaik Aerofly doesn't have dirt strips. Besides, with bush flying I also (somehow) think about flying low above trees and all (might be totally mistaken here LOL) and Aerofly isn't suited for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this