October 1, 20196 yr Microsoft Flight Simulator Developer Interview - Episode 2: Aerodynamics & Cockpit Premieres Oct 1, 2019
October 1, 20196 yr Thanks for that. Looking forward to the next installment. Specs: I9-13900K, RTX 4090, 32gb Ram |Headsets: HP Reverb
October 1, 20196 yr This is looking pretty amazing.. wonder how my PC will stand up to the demands of the new engine, weather and all... Another FSX experience? Edited October 1, 20196 yr by Bert Pieke Bert
October 1, 20196 yr 7 minutes ago, Bert Pieke said: Another FSX experience? But it worth it, man, all other sims became boring / dull all the sudden after watching and still watching what MSFS looked like. Ali A. MSFS on PC: I9-13900KS | ASUS ROG STRIX Z790 MB | 64GB DDR5/6000MHz RAM | ASUS TUF RTX4090 OCE | 1TB M.2 Samsung 990 Pro (Windows) +2TB Samsung 990 Pro for MSFS + 2TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD for DATA | EK-Nucleus AIO CR360 Lux D-RGB CPU cooler. HP Reverb G2 VR (occasional use) | LG-45GX950A-B 5K 5120X2160 monitor | Tobii Eye tracker 5 | Logitech sound system 7.1 | VIRPIL Controls (Joystick + thrust levers + rudder pedals) | Windows 11 Pro.
October 1, 20196 yr 4 hours ago, Bert Pieke said: This is looking pretty amazing.. wonder how my PC will stand up to the demands of the new engine, weather and all... Another FSX experience? Tell me if I am wrong but I don’t remember FSX being presented to a bunch of people on upper (not top) end machines who reported a smooth flight. Now some of us can worry about the 25 mbps connection... Edited October 1, 20196 yr by domkle Dominique Simming since 1981 - [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam
October 1, 20196 yr 4 hours ago, Bert Pieke said: This is looking pretty amazing.. wonder how my PC will stand up to the demands of the new engine, weather and all... Another FSX experience? By all accounts, that will not be the case. The technology seems to be highly optimised for modern machines, and not necessarily top end. It will not be a FSX disaster. This seems evident from all the reports received yesterday. Not one of the Youtubers invited to the event complained about performance. In fact, many remarked at how good it was despite the complexity of the scene
October 1, 20196 yr 5 hours ago, ErichB said: By all accounts, that will not be the case. The technology seems to be highly optimised for modern machines, and not necessarily top end. It will not be a FSX disaster. This seems evident from all the reports received yesterday. Not one of the Youtubers invited to the event complained about performance. In fact, many remarked at how good it was despite the complexity of the scene Agree.. looking good! Bert
October 1, 20196 yr Author 11 hours ago, ErichB said: By all accounts, that will not be the case. The technology seems to be highly optimised for modern machines, and not necessarily top end. It will not be a FSX disaster. This seems evident from all the reports received yesterday. Not one of the Youtubers invited to the event complained about performance. In fact, many remarked at how good it was despite the complexity of the scene Exactly!
October 1, 20196 yr 17 hours ago, Bert Pieke said: This is looking pretty amazing.. wonder how my PC will stand up to the demands of the new engine, weather and all... Another FSX experience? It appears that your internet speed will be just as important as your computer specs based on the recent conversions regarding real-time downloaded scenery data as you fly. Slower connections will result in lower scenery details to maintain bandwidth. Apparently though you can preload the scenery on your projected route to avoid slower internet connection issues. And of course how fat your wallet is to pay for monthly unlimited bandwidth data downloads from your ISP! Edited October 1, 20196 yr by Kilo60 Chris Camp
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.