Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
G-RFRY

MK Studios DUBLIN Released

Recommended Posts

Are you saying that version 1.10 specifically does not have the option to uninstall? I have version 1.02 installed (or whatever the version was before 1.10), and it has an option to uninstall via Control Panel.

Edited by Christopher Low

Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

Are you saying that version 1.10 specifically does not have the option to uninstall? I have version 1.02 installed (or whatever the version was before 1.10), and it has an option to uninstall via Control Panel.

 

Agghh! My mistake. There was an uninstaller. I missed it. Sorry.


Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.2 & v3.4, Intel i7-8086K o/c to 5.2Ghz, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti 11Gb, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO SSD, Asus Prime Z370-A mobo, 32Gb G.Skill DDR4 3000Mhz RAM, Win 10 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post
39 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

I just wanted to comment on the uninstall / reinstall process for MK-Studio Dublin. I downloaded v1.10 to replace the earlier one. But, there's no uninstaller and the readme notes don't say how to uninstall. Not great.

So I deleted the entry in Add-on Organiser and then deleted the Dublin folder under Ecosystem\MKSTUDIOS. Hardly user friendly. The new version is now installed but they really need to look at the guidance they offer for users.

There is a problem with the supplied AFD. I have checked this twice now so I'm sure it's a valid problem. Some aircraft will lineup on 28 but not take-off. Example is Aer Lingus RJ85 departing around 11:28. Twice using the supplied AFD it lined up on 28 but the status stayed as Takeoff 1. It never took off and was eventually deleted by P3D.

I swapped the AFD for the one supplied over at AIG and no such problems. All aircraft (including the RJ85) line up and depart. There must be a minor difference in the AFDs but I'm not wasting time looking for it. If you want the AIG one you can get it here.
https://www.alpha-india.net/forums/index.php?topic=31599.msg318551#msg318551

I have to admit I've encountered this behavior of AI traffic in other 3rd party scenery (FSDT for example). What causes this exactly?


Shom

[P3D v5.1 HF1 running on Win 10 Pro, i7-9700K, EVGA 1080Ti, Crucial 2666 16GB, 2 500GB Samsung EVOs 850/860]

[FSLabs A319/320/321, Feelthere E170/175/190/195 v3, PMDG 737 NGXu ,TFDI 717, Aerosoft CRJ Pro, Majestic Dash 8, CS 757 iii, Feelthere ERJ-145, Fly The Maddog X, QW 787, PMDG 777]

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, Shomron said:

I have to admit I've encountered this behavior of AI traffic in other 3rd party scenery (FSDT for example). What causes this exactly?

I don't know, sorry. Clearly a small difference in the way the AFD for the runway is designed. You would have to compare the two and see if you can see the differences.


Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.2 & v3.4, Intel i7-8086K o/c to 5.2Ghz, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti 11Gb, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO SSD, Asus Prime Z370-A mobo, 32Gb G.Skill DDR4 3000Mhz RAM, Win 10 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post

I am really surprised that they still have a problem with departures on runway 28. Several users (myself included) corrected that little problem on our own PCs not long after version 1.00 was released, and the AIG one is freely available.


Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post

Help Please.

Dublin scenery MK Studios installed  in Prepar3d V4 with no problems.

I got an email from simMarket this morning telling me a new release is available.

I've just installed it and now on the bridges I have the big X.

Any body else got this problem and do you have a fix?

 

waiting in anticipation

Ken

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Looks like changes have been made to SODE objects. They did have conflicts between EIDW and LPPT (at least) with objects having the same name and that apparently is no longer allowed from SODE version "XXX" onwards (not sure which one).

Don't quote me on that, but there were definitely issues which might have been fixed now and causing problems with a failed/incomplete uninstall of previous versions?


LeNovo Legion 5 PRO · 32GB GSkill RipjawZ 3200 18-18-18 · nVidia RTX3070 · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · WD S550 1TB M.2 PCIe

LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz GSYNC · Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick with Throttle Quadrant

38.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post

So for those that have the new version 1.10, I understand that MKS put in the progress on the construction of the new runway, correct? I was wondering if any of you could show what this looks like on approach or departure, because the shots they had on their Facebook did not look particularly convincing to me, to the point that I was considering sticking with v1.02.


Benjamin van Soldt

Windows 10 64bit - i5-8600k @ 4.7GHz - ASRock Fatality K6 Z370 - EVGA GTX1070 SC 8GB VRAM - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX @ 3200MHz - Samsung 960 Evo SSD M.2 NVMe 500GB - 2x Samsung 860 Evo SSD 1TB (P3Dv4/5 drive) - Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200RPM - Seasonic FocusPlus Gold 750W - Noctua DH-15S - Fractal Design Focus G (White) Case

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Benjamin J said:

So for those that have the new version 1.10, I understand that MKS put in the progress on the construction of the new runway, correct? I was wondering if any of you could show what this looks like on approach or departure, because the shots they had on their Facebook did not look particularly convincing to me, to the point that I was considering sticking with v1.02.

Interesting you should mention that because I am new to MKS Dublin and installed it last night because the v5 installer just became available.  I was going to post a screenshot later after work of that construction to ask if what I was seeing was right, because it looked to me like another scenery was bleeding through - there are some misaligned runway textures that just go over roads on the photoscenery background and don't blend particularly well with the existing textures or construction background. I will post a shot a little later today...since it is a new v5 install, the only other scenery it could be conflicting with is default.


Chris Burnett, Working Title
Working Title Website | Working Title Github | Working Title Discord
Download the latest version of the Working Title CJ4, G3000, G1000 and G3X from our website.

i9 9900K @ 5Ghz | Radeon RX 6800 | 32GB DDR4 3200 MHz | 2 x M.2 Gen 3x4 1TB SSDs + 1 x SATA 1TB SSD
Honeycomb Alpha Yoke | Honeycomb Bravo Throttle | Saitek Rudder Pedals | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, cwburnett said:

there are some misaligned runway textures that just go over roads on the photoscenery background and don't blend particularly well with the existing textures or construction background.

I take it back, they're not misaligned. Upon further inspection, they're okay, but there are some oddities when looking closer. The new runway textures were added without updating the photo background, so it just looks a little odd. Not a big deal overall.

1 hour ago, Benjamin J said:

I was wondering if any of you could show what this looks like on approach or departure, because the shots they had on their Facebook did not look particularly convincing to me, to the point that I was considering sticking with v1.02.

Here are some shots:

https://i.imgur.com/8zXLFEE.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/J9xYKbk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/i5Vxmxb.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/fgclfvv.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/FEEJCp4.jpg

In the last one you can see the boundary fence appears now unscathed by the construction and is simply on top of the new runway. We're really into deep nitpicking here, though, nothing I'm in any way worried about.

Edited by cwburnett

Chris Burnett, Working Title
Working Title Website | Working Title Github | Working Title Discord
Download the latest version of the Working Title CJ4, G3000, G1000 and G3X from our website.

i9 9900K @ 5Ghz | Radeon RX 6800 | 32GB DDR4 3200 MHz | 2 x M.2 Gen 3x4 1TB SSDs + 1 x SATA 1TB SSD
Honeycomb Alpha Yoke | Honeycomb Bravo Throttle | Saitek Rudder Pedals | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS

Share this post


Link to post
17 minutes ago, cwburnett said:

Here are some shots:

https://i.imgur.com/8zXLFEE.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/J9xYKbk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/i5Vxmxb.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/fgclfvv.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/FEEJCp4.jpg

In the last one you can see the boundary fence appears now unscathed by the construction and is simply on top of the new runway. We're really into deep nitpicking here, though, nothing I'm in any way worried about.

Thanks for posting those, very helpful! See, I just don't like the look of it. It's as if they just plopped down a polygon on there and gave it some generic, highly repetitive texture. If the airport looks amazingly realistic, this 'new runway' immediately kicks me straight back into my living room. I'm honestly quite disappointed with this... Is there a way to get rid of it, or is it part of the ground poly?


Benjamin van Soldt

Windows 10 64bit - i5-8600k @ 4.7GHz - ASRock Fatality K6 Z370 - EVGA GTX1070 SC 8GB VRAM - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX @ 3200MHz - Samsung 960 Evo SSD M.2 NVMe 500GB - 2x Samsung 860 Evo SSD 1TB (P3Dv4/5 drive) - Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200RPM - Seasonic FocusPlus Gold 750W - Noctua DH-15S - Fractal Design Focus G (White) Case

Share this post


Link to post
14 minutes ago, Benjamin J said:

Thanks for posting those, very helpful! See, I just don't like the look of it. It's as if they just plopped down a polygon on there and gave it some generic, highly repetitive texture. If the airport looks amazingly realistic, this 'new runway' immediately kicks me straight back into my living room. I'm honestly quite disappointed with this... Is there a way to get rid of it, or is it part of the ground poly?

Just browsing the Scenery folder, I do not see an obvious bgl file for just the new runway construction textures to disable.


Chris Burnett, Working Title
Working Title Website | Working Title Github | Working Title Discord
Download the latest version of the Working Title CJ4, G3000, G1000 and G3X from our website.

i9 9900K @ 5Ghz | Radeon RX 6800 | 32GB DDR4 3200 MHz | 2 x M.2 Gen 3x4 1TB SSDs + 1 x SATA 1TB SSD
Honeycomb Alpha Yoke | Honeycomb Bravo Throttle | Saitek Rudder Pedals | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you for letting us know about this. I agree with Benjamin that it does not look very realistic, so I will be making sure that I do not upgrade from my existing version. Any updates like this need to be done carefully, otherwise they can look very generic and unconvincing.

Edited by Christopher Low

Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    53%
    $13,405.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...