December 3, 20196 yr I've done night VFR and as stated as long as you stay in VFR conditions and don't play hide and seek in clouds or fog, it's actually very nice. One thing to make sure is that you file a VFR flightplan and have ATC at all times as sometimes traffic is hard to see. Thank you. Rick $Silver Donor EAA 1317610 I7-7700K @ 4.5ghz, MSI Z270 Gaming MB, 32gb 3200, Geforce RTX2080 Super O/C, 28" Samsung 4k Monitor, Various SSD, HD, and peripherals
December 4, 20196 yr 8 hours ago, himmelhorse said: However, I question the wisdom of taking off at 1.30AM into a weather front which forces you to fly at 1000ft, I cannot imagine, that you could spot an airfield at that height, until you were almost on top of it, or at least very close.That would call for some pretty precise navigation, I have to assume his aircraft was GPS equipped. Back in my time there was no GPS, and the GA aircraft I'm flying today still aren't GPS equipped. Still navigating the old fashioned way. It's definitely satisfying when your navigation calculations and precise flying work out, so that you arrive over your planned waypoint exactly at the correct time. And you don't start sweating when the GPS fails 😉
December 4, 20196 yr 4 hours ago, FDEdev said: Back in my time there was no GPS, and the GA aircraft I'm flying today still aren't GPS equipped. Still navigating the old fashioned way. It's definitely satisfying when your navigation calculations and precise flying work out, so that you arrive over your planned waypoint exactly at the correct time. And you don't start sweating when the GPS fails 😉 Memories of threads long gone with Larry Adamson 😁 Edited December 4, 20196 yr by domkle Dominique Simming since 1981 - [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam
December 4, 20196 yr 8 hours ago, FDEdev said: Still navigating the old fashioned way. It's definitely satisfying when your navigation calculations and precise flying work out, so that you arrive over your planned waypoint exactly at the correct time. This is how I fell in love with flight simulator. being able to tune two VFRs and calculating where two radials intersect and flying one till it disappears and then flying blind for a while and then seeing your VFR come back to life and fly that radial right to your destination. The early versions of FS only had a few areas done and it was great fun to fly blind between them and see that it actually was one connected world. | Dave | I've been around for most of my life. There's always a sunset happening somewhere in the world that somebody is enjoying.
December 4, 20196 yr 19 hours ago, himmelhorse said: However, I question the wisdom of taking off at 1.30AM into a weather front which forces you to fly at 1000ft, I cannot imagine, that you could spot an airfield at that height, until you were almost on top of it, or at least very close. You'd be surprised at how far you can see from 1000ft. The theoretical visual horizon at 1000ft agl is almost 39 miles (approximate distance to the horizon in miles = 1.23 times the square root of the eye height in feet - https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/horizon.html). Even further if you allow for atmospheric refraction! Obviously met visibility or obstructions/high ground can significantly reduce that but it's still potentially a long way. Edited December 4, 20196 yr by vortex681 i7-14700k | Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F Gaming WIFI | 32GB DDR5 RAM | MSI RTX 4080 Super | WD Black SN850X 1TB & 2TB | Corsair HX1000i ATX3.0 | MSI MAG401QR 40" monitor | Win 11 Pro 64-bit | Meta Quest 3
December 4, 20196 yr 4 hours ago, sightseer said: This is how I fell in love with flight simulator. being able to tune two VFRs and calculating where two radials intersect and flying one till it disappears and then flying blind for a while and then seeing your VFR come back to life and fly that radial right to your destination. The early versions of FS only had a few areas done and it was great fun to fly blind between them and see that it actually was one connected world. When I first started with FS-5.1, that's exactly what I did. I had a document where I recorded the frequencies for different cities, and for each city would say that from here I could go east to such and such, NW to somewhere else, south to another, etc. The was no map in those days, but I had found a way to fly pretty much everywhere in the eastern half of the US. Edited December 4, 20196 yr by andyjohnston.net
December 4, 20196 yr This issue with being forced down to 1000 ft AGL is definitely a slight problem with visibility as far is seeing visual checkpoints, but really the larger problem is one of time. Take a typical single engine Cessna. At best glide speed of 65 knots, you get a (somewhat optimistic) glide ratio of 9:1. So that's 9000 ft (1.5 NM) forward for your 1000 feet of altitude. Had that engine vibration turned in to a full blown engine failure, you have less than a minute and a half before you are on the ground somewhere...and since it is night, you are really limited in your options for picking where to put it down. @carmined kudos for recognizing for situation, asking ATC for help and getting down on the ground asap! Weather in the summer in FL is easy to forecast (hazy, hot, and humid, with a chance of thunder storms), but hard to predict! That was a good story! Chris
December 4, 20196 yr 12 hours ago, domkle said: Memories of threads long gone with Larry Adamson 😁 Chris
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.