Anyone have any experience with this title-B. RENK - MYWORLD LANDCLASS X? It is fairly expensive but supposed to do a better job of landclass worldwide?http://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

Hi Geoff,Glad you asked. I just bought it three days ago, and I'll try it out tonight and tell you the results tomorrow.Regards,

Thanks for the quick response!-I look forward to hearing your results.http://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

>Hi Geoff,>>Glad you asked. I just bought it three days ago, and I'll try>it out tonight and tell you the results tomorrow.>>Regards,Did you try out MYWORLD LANDCLASS X?

HiSee two comparison shots i took. I use Myworld for FSX and this was taken just outside Miami. I'm not familiar with the area, so couldn't tell you which is more accurate:First : default FSX Landclasshttp://img466.imageshack.us/img466/2286/ext5.jpgSecond : Myworld Landclass Xhttp://img485.imageshack.us/img485/4392/dch3.jpgAnd here is another one from Myworld Landclass Xhttp://img390.imageshack.us/img390/6775/gws1.jpgHTH :-)

ok. Where do you get it?

simmarket.comhttp://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

Thanks for the shots-I am not familiar with Miami either so I don't know if that is an improvement or not. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

hey, the eyes of the world are upon you :-)i think the big question everybody has is--what does it do to the great american desert?do you think you could find a minute to shoot, say, the mountain flying lesson with and without myworld x? or maybe the area around grand forks from 20,000 feet?many many thanks!

Perhaps you could publish that on the sreenies forum...

Yep-it would be great!http://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

I bought it and found that it replaced alot of my coastal towns on the Oregon coast with desert textures.. Flying in Yakima WA also resulted in more desert and less city.. I removed the program.

great news! my budget is extremely tight... :-)

That is a shame. Hope there is a good fix out there eventually.http://mywebpages.comcast.net/geofa/pages/rxp-pilot.jpg

Hi All,Its' the textures causing the grief, plain and simple. A more accurate landclass will help define a region, but does it help if the textures applied are completly shot? Understand I am not talking about the city & rural tiles, just most of the areas in between.In the picture below I have compared FS9 original textures to FSX, as well as the default Land Classes. As you notice, there is minimal difference in the land class between versions, but look at the textures that were applied to that class in FS9 vs FSX. You can repeat this senario for alot of the others as well. The sad part is we had detailed 256 tiles in FS9, now we have plain 1024 ones. I can not think of any other reason except - rush, rush, rush.http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/160696.jpgI always expect to use add-ons to enhance MSFS, but being forced to oustide source a texture pack that brings default FSX UP TO FS9? One step forwards, two back. Is this fix going to be at our cost?Phil I believe this part is somewhat related to your department yes? Are you happy with the textures, what do you think ?Not wanting to ramble on as I have already renamed half of these as a temp fix, but I don't see how anyones' land class is going to fix this - unless they dont call out the texture sets that are like this. (and there's quite a few ...)Best Regards'Garett