List: What should be fixed with a next release of P3D

[mpo910 2,112]

12 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Pls let them be invi🥳sible 

Have you read my tip about FSGRW. Makes a difference...

Before : https://www.dropbox.com/s/x4lphhi4y8zyxk2/Foto 03-03-2021 14 28 53.jpg?dl=0

After : https://www.dropbox.com/s/x28q9wq81gmmp6e/Foto 03-03-2021 17 41 16.jpg?dl=0

 

 

Yes and yes....

Invisible mena's they (LM) have time to work.....

Tops with FSGRW means....well....there can be more variations....

Marcus

Edited March 3, 2021 by mpo910

[GSalden 4,657]

1 hour ago, B777ER said:

A complete redo of night lighting and night textures. Loooong overdue. 

Here the night lighting  look fantastic....

 

[mpo910 2,112]

1 minute ago, GSalden said:

Here the night lighting  look fantastic....

 

Yes I think it is good as it is.....and since v5 the draw distance of lights  increased and patch wise loading got way better....

 

[GSalden 4,657]

2 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

 

Tops with FSGRW means....well....there can be more variations....

And that looks way better than the current pancake clouds with an OC.

regards, Gerard

[GSalden 4,657]

1 minute ago, mpo910 said:

Yes I think it is good as it is.....and since v5 the draw distance of lights  increased and patch wise loading got way better....

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/euj5cqlz8uzfmuj/Foto 07-10-2020 16 16 20.png?dl=0

[mpo910 2,112]

24 minutes ago, kevinfirth said:

But it's not a pretty sight.... 

True....pretty is....LM has babysitters, as others called it here....., and they have time to work....for us.... 😉

I don't care.....let the babysitters do the housework and doorbell

 

[mpo910 2,112]

5 minutes ago, GSalden said:

And that looks way better than the current pancake clouds with an OC.

regards, Gerard

I agree.....But the Dutch so like Pancakes.....and you image shows more poffertjes....which are better than pancakes

But I LM must solve some things as stated in my first post I think. 

Edited March 3, 2021 by mpo910

[kevinfirth 1,396]

3 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

True....pretty is....LM has babysitters, as others called it here....., and they have time to work....for us.... 😉

I don't care.....let the babysitters do the housework and doorbell

 

Marcus, you're doing an amazing job, keep on going. I will post a bit more at LM, but those two *deleted* 'babysitters' (how to say this diplomatically?), don't half take the professional shine off what is a fantastic SIM 🤣

Edited March 3, 2021 by kevinfirth

[GSalden 4,657]

2 minutes ago, kevinfirth said:

Marcus, you're doing an amazing job, keep on going. I will post a bit more at LM, but those two *deleted* 'babysitters' (how to say this diplomatically?), don't half take the professional shine off what is a fantastic SIM 🤣

Kevin for President 👍

[mpo910 2,112]

7 minutes ago, kevinfirth said:

Marcus, you're doing an amazing job, keep on going. I will post a bit more at LM, but those two *deleted* 'babysitters' (how to say this diplomatically?), don't half take the professional shine off what is a fantastic SIM 🤣

LOL.....Now I had to laugh.....

The Sim is really great. I do really like it. But I am always pushing the boundaries....as I know that others do expect also nice visual enhancements.

Performance is really great.....VRAM will surely have their attention as lots posted issues about this. 

So, performance, VRAM and Truesky are the big points to convince others  who are still on v4.x

 

Edited March 3, 2021 by mpo910

[kevinfirth 1,396]

My wish for improvement is for a better implementation of the sloped runways functionality.  You can make it work ok with default assets, but I understand that it's almost impossible to overlay a ground poly over a varying terrain (hence why no Devs have taken advantage of the new feature, opting to remain with full flat airports instead.) MSFS has tools that make this much easier I think.  Perhaps LM should give some consideration to creating a tool that allows quick and easy airport terrain management, to reduce the investment of time necessary.  All the scenery content development tools over the years have been borne from community efforts, and have become standard issue, but it has taken years for them to mature.  I think LM has until PMDG sorts it's word not allowed out and gets add-on aircraft in MSFS, otherwise I can see P3D users further splitting in favour of MSFS (warts and all) which could inexorably lead to the add-on development ecosystem for P3D becoming much smaller and unprofitable completely.  If LM wishes to retain the value of the ecosystem, it needs to help and protect it by implementing features in such a way to make development easy, not hard!

Edited March 3, 2021 by kevinfirth

[mpo910 2,112]

5 minutes ago, kevinfirth said:

My wish for improvement is for a better implementation of the slopes runways functionality.  You can make it work ok with default assets, but I understand that it's almost impossible to overlay a ground poly over a varying terrain (hence why no Devs have taken advantage of the new feature, opting to remain with full flat airports instead.) MSFS has tools that make this much easier I think.  Perhaps LM should give some consideration to creating a tool that allows quick and easy airport terrain management, to reduce the investment of time necessary.  All the scenery content development tools over the years have been borne from community efforts, and have become standard issue, but it has taken years for them to mature.  I think LM has until PMDG sorts it's word not allowed out and gets add-on aircraft in MSFS, otherwise I can see P3D users further splitting in favour of MSFS (warts and all) which could inexorably lead to the add-on development ecosystem for P3D becomingich smaller and unprofitable completely.  If LM wishes to retain the value of the ecosystem, it needs to help and protect it by implementing features in such a way to make development easy, not hard!

I 100% agree on this. Some weeks ago I opened a topic here at AVSIM about LM delivering features which are hardly used....and some devs chimed in and explained why...

I did not forget this.....I like sloped runways. It looks so great.

But for now I think LM should finish what they started with Truesky.....as this has a huge impact on visual quality, more than sloped runways I think. 

As it always is.......Time, money, priorities, technical debts, competitions .....always leveraging those things....is not easy at all.

Edited March 3, 2021 by mpo910

[kevinfirth 1,396]

4 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

So, performance, VRAM and Truesky are the big points to convince others  who are still on v4.x

These are all good selling points, as long as you have the hardware to exploit them (nothing new there though 🙂)

[kevinfirth 1,396]

Another recent beef for me is the speedtrees implementation. Up til now I was ok with the dual planar trees, but more recently I'm becoming very dissatisfied with them.  🙁  @Rob_Ainscough where are you? 😉

[B777ER 2,486]

27 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Here the night lighting  look fantastic....

 

Your post is utterly lacking in context and you know it is so just stop with the semantics already. I know your specific setup includes all that night lighting you purchased from that individual whom we cannot mention (with good reason as his business is terrible). 

So you forgot to add "with a few hundred dollars of add-ons ". I'm talking about default redo.