May 19, 20215 yr Wondering if its just time to upgrade, or if anyone else notices poor performance specifically with the 747/787s. The A320N and other prop planes seem overall usable. Its just the Boeings that kind of have a hard time for me. Did a flight from KLAX - KSFO and on final was getting like 3 fps couldnt even land and the game became unresponsive. First time ever in 275 hours of play time. Edited May 19, 20215 yr by M3Stang 5700X3D 64GB DDR4-3600MHz Gigabyte 4070 Super Game installed on 980 PRO Main display Gigabyte M27Q X 27" 1440p 240Hz
May 19, 20215 yr I don't find they have a bad performance and i fly this Birds a lot.. But i assume this still have to do with the performance of the sim itself. I sometimes get complete holds of the sim from seconds but the Boeings are just performing OK for me. cheers 😉 08.2024 new PC is online : ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Mainboard, AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D Prozessor, G.Skill DIMM 64 GB DDR5-6000 (2x 32 GB) Dual-Kit, MSI GeForce RTX 4090 VENTUS 3X E 24G OC Grafikkarte, 2x WD Black SN850X NVMe SSD 4 TB - Drive C+D, WD Gold Enterprise Class 12 TB for storage HDD, Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1000W PC - Power supply, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Aircooler with 7 Heatpipes, Design Meshify 2 White TG Clear Tint Tower-Case, 3x 4K monitors 2x32 Samsung 1x27 LG 3840x2160, Windows11 Prof. 23H2 - now Windows11 Prof. 25H2 Flightsimulator Hardware: Honeycomb Throttle Bravo, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro, Logitech Flight Joke System, XBox Controller, some Thrustmaster stuff, Winwing CDU Panels.
May 19, 20215 yr I noticed with the Heavy Mod 787 that the performance was abysmal compared to the FBW NEO. I remember in the past that the NEO had a terrible performance because the displays were highly CPU dependantant. I don't believe FBW fixed that, but they did in their remaking of their displays make it less performance impactful. I think the 787 is still suffering from that initial pain of the default ND. My recommendation is for you to see if the Glass Cockpit Refresh Rate will give you a boost by going to a LOW instead of Medium or High. Hope that helps. Follow me on : Instagram See my Trailer: A Year Of Flight
May 19, 20215 yr I've found the 747 cockpit performance to be pretty good (probably better than the FBW on balance) but the 787 performance is just awful, unfortunately. It often seems to get worse toward the end of a longer flight, too. External view performance is fantastic, making for a very obvious contrast. I agree it's almost certainly something to do with how the cockpit displays are coded. Even low refresh doesn't make it much better, but medium or high refresh absolutely trashes the framerate. James
May 19, 20215 yr I have the 6700K and it's OK for FSX - but depending on your settings, it may not be optimal for 2020(?)
May 19, 20215 yr Afaik it's a Javascript Garbage Collection (GC) problem. An object, if not in use anymore, has to be erased from memory. Coherent GT/JS does that very regularly and that can result in microstutters. So the programmers need to find ways to avoid GC producing microstutter. Maybe by keeping and reusing objects. Well, developer stuff I don't entirely understand. 🙂 Edited May 19, 20215 yr by crimplene
May 19, 20215 yr Tried a long haul yesterday with the 787 and it CTDed after 5hrs over the Atlantic. Never had any CTD with only flying the FBW neo or CRJ… Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
May 19, 20215 yr Author 4 hours ago, overspeed3 said: I have the 6700K and it's OK for FSX - but depending on your settings, it may not be optimal for 2020(?) Yeah it is getting long in the tooth but just about every other aircraft is fine on my system at ultra 200 LOD 1440p so I kind of blame the aircraft 😜 5700X3D 64GB DDR4-3600MHz Gigabyte 4070 Super Game installed on 980 PRO Main display Gigabyte M27Q X 27" 1440p 240Hz
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.