5 hours ago, spitzer45 said:

Your graphic card is not for 4k resolution. So you should reduce your render scaling. And also your cpu is not strong enough for tlod 200 and above, may be max 150 for big cities. 

I would be very surprised if a system exists that wouldn't choke a bit on this scenario, what with 4k res, Fenix 320, TLOD 200, Orbx city and iniBuilds EFLL? Definitely sounds like a system choker to me.

12 hours ago, crimplene said:

A Render Scaling of 100 with TAA in 4k resolution most definetly is too much for the 2080ti. It depends on the size and distance of the screen but I was always quite ok with a render scaling of 80. But DLSS will be much faster, even in quality setting. The other thing is the Terrain LOD of 200. Near big cities you really should scale that down, maybe to 120 or 150 max. This is a compromise, of course but absolutely unavoidabnle with medium spec hardware like this. Some people here say that over London he will be CPU bound so that scaling down the render scaling would have no effect. Of course it has. I have over 40 fps with a small plane over London with DLSS or RS 70 and LOD of 130. If I use higher settings, fps drop dramatically. With the Fenix you will never get more than maybe 35 fps, especially if you have a traffic addon running. But scaling down LOD almost always helps a lot.

Conclusion:
- lower Terrain LOD!
- lower Render Scaling!
- better: DLSS. With the Fenix, DLSS looks very good in my opinion.

Additional thoughts:
- Clouds from Ultra to High always gives some additional frames.
- Trees from Ultra to High depends a bit on the scenery but can help
- Windshield effects ALWAYS on ULTRA becaus ot looks much mor realistic in my opinion and doesn't cost frames.
- Water waves always on ULTRA in my opinion, because water looks much better on ultra.
- Object LOD does not harm the framerate much. So 200 is almost always ok.

Thanks for this info. Applied it and it made my approach into EGLL almost like butter...! (Landing wasn't bad either!).

One thing I did notice was the FENIX A320 displays were a little blurred on movement (particularly the altitude indicator on the PFD). Which of these settings could I tweak to improve this?

Thanks again.

3 hours ago, BWBriscoe said:

One thing I did notice was the FENIX A320 displays were a little blurred on movement (particularly the altitude indicator on the PFD). Which of these settings could I tweak to improve this?

That is the result of using DLSS - TAA will fix it but you will lose some FPS>

7 hours ago, BWBriscoe said:

Thanks for this info. Applied it and it made my approach into EGLL almost like butter...! (Landing wasn't bad either!).

One thing I did notice was the FENIX A320 displays were a little blurred on movement (particularly the altitude indicator on the PFD). Which of these settings could I tweak to improve this?

Thanks again.

Well, as Glenn already wrote, this is an unwanted effect of DLSS. Asobo stated that the displays for now can't be rendered separately so we have either to live with that blurryness or with TAA on an 80 or 70 setting if we want a similar (or slightly worse) framerate. Overall DLSS on quality setting in my view is much more crisp especially in the scenery and cockpit textures. So I ignore the slight blurryness of moving digital displays.

I would try Render Scaling = 80, Terrain LOD = 150 and Clouds to High.

Turn everything down to medium, and then work your way up, or, more likely, down from there.

After two smooth flights with decent fps, you won't care about the difference.

A lot of these settings are marketing bs anyway: super ultra high! Extra double high ultra!!! 4k maximum insanity high!

Nvidia, Intel, and AMD thank you for shopping with them.