What FBW A320 to install?

[jlund 380]

I'm getting a new PC this week, primary for MSFS, and one of the first things I will install is FBW's A320, but what version do you recommend?

Stable, Development or the Experimental version?

JL

[Paul K 1,336]

Stable. Never do anything experimental in MSFS.

[DAD 2,653]

Experimental. flying this since many months and never had any issues

[RaptyrOne 1,413]

1 hour ago, Paul K said:

Stable. Never do anything experimental in MSFS.

Disagree.😉 Experimental has been rock solid over the past year or more and has some significant advancements over Stable.

100’s hours in Experimental.  

[Spike54 34]

The experimental version. TOD marker and Autoland, (a godsend when you're flying drunk) 🙂

 

[Noel 4,503]

2 hours ago, Paul K said:

Stable. Never do anything experimental in MSFS.

I've used the Experimental for months and it's been great:  VNAV, performance, etc

[Chunk 251]

Another vote for experimental here, no issues that I have experienced.  YMMV as always.

[gb09f 298]

Experimental here too. Keep an eye on the Github site and you can see all the latest changes & improvements. 

[Watsi 2,574]

Yeah, our naming seems a bit off these days. Since Experimental actually is kinda our developement version (where we develop stuff), and Developement  version is actually pretty stable. And our Stable version is for the most part: old.  😄

[Fiorentoni 4,235]

Experimental. I've had only one time a critical bug on experimental in the about 2 years I've been using it. It has the newest features, most of all VNAV (albeit not in a final state, obviously).

[Max Kraus 339]

I have never had an issue with the experimental, but basically they're all pretty much the same to be honest. You fine with any of them.

[speedyTC 195]

+1 for the Experimental version. No issues.

[jlund 380]

Thanks for the help. Experimental it is then 🙂