January 13, 20242 yr Author How would you guys feel about no cockpit window? Just cameras to rely on. As long as there's plenty of redundancy I'd be okay with it.
January 13, 20242 yr One thing for sure, Martin, they won't be battery powered. Noel The tires are worn. The shocks are shot. The steering is wobbly. But the engine still runs fine.
January 13, 20242 yr Wow two in one day! A2A just released their Floating Jellyfish reconnaissance craft! 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
January 13, 20242 yr 15:00 He says they are going to fly if over cities in America and then wait to see if the citizens below agree that the sonic boom is quiet enough. Then he says they believe that they have greatly reduced pollution this plane makes at high altitude, at least on the drawing board. But nobody can be sure until its flown and measured. 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
January 13, 20242 yr 17:33 Pam Melroy promising how quiet it is "a mere whisper" and cuts flying time NY to LA in half! 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
January 13, 20242 yr The Spirit of St. Louis had no forward facing windows Intel Core i9-10900K at 5.2GHz, Corsair H115i PRO, ASUS MAXIMUS XII HERO Z490, G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 15-16-16-36, ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090, SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS M.2 2280 1TB x 3, Corsair HX Series HX1000 Watt PSU, Pimax Crystal LIght.
January 13, 20242 yr Author 39 minutes ago, FBW737 said: The Spirit of St. Louis had no forward facing windows Oh yes, that's true. I recall he used a periscope out of the side windows.
January 13, 20242 yr Author 4 hours ago, birdguy said: One thing for sure, Martin, they won't be battery powered. Noel 😁 I don't think anybody knows much about the aircrafts electrical system, but I'd imagine the forward vision system is powered the same way any avionics system is. In this case, no doubt with lots of redundancy. This is just a prototype, but the technology is intended to be used in passenger aircraft. So a forward vision system that is extremely unlikely to fail is vital. I'm wondering if, when we eventually see this minimal boom supersonic technology in passenger jets, if there will also be an advanced auto-land system in case the forward vision system fails. Edited January 13, 20242 yr by martin-w
January 13, 20242 yr By the time that technology sees the light light of day in real commercial use I guarantee there will no longer be human pilots on commercial airliner. The days of the human pilots in commercial aviation are extremely numbered. Intel Core i9-10900K at 5.2GHz, Corsair H115i PRO, ASUS MAXIMUS XII HERO Z490, G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 15-16-16-36, ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090, SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS M.2 2280 1TB x 3, Corsair HX Series HX1000 Watt PSU, Pimax Crystal LIght.
January 14, 20242 yr I would think the forward vision system would be on flat screen monitor similar to the way we fly our simulators today. It would also have the glass cockpit screens on the monitor just like we do. That seems logical to me. Noel The tires are worn. The shocks are shot. The steering is wobbly. But the engine still runs fine.
January 14, 20242 yr 8 hours ago, Fielder said: 17:33 Pam Melroy promising how quiet it is "a mere whisper" and cuts flying time NY to LA in half! She also said "a gentle plunk", if I heard her correctly, and NASA says the sound levels closest to those of the X-59 sonic thump were the car door slams recorded across the street and distant thunder". Anyway, definitely much better than a "boom". You can see the location of the camera for the main display just above the canards. I wonder how they deal with bugsplats. Maybe there's a teeny tiny windshield wiper, like the Mercedes headlights used to have. Dugald Walker
January 14, 20242 yr On 1/13/2024 at 8:50 AM, martin-w said: How would you guys feel about no cockpit window? Just cameras to rely on. I think cameras instead of windows are fine. We have the technology so we should take advantage of it. The only issue I see is that with only a forward vision camera the pilot would lose some situational awareness. I understand that a pilot could rely solely on instruments to fly, but having side views would be helpful IMO. Maybe the plane will incorporate side view cameras as well. Dave Simulator: P3Dv6.1 System Specs: Intel i7 13700K CPU, MSI Mag Z790 Tomahawk Motherboard, 32GB DDR5 6000MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Video Card, 3x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro M.2 2280 SSDs, Windows 11 Home OS My website for P3D stuff: https://sites.google.com/view/thep3dfiles/home
January 14, 20242 yr Author 11 minutes ago, dave2013 said: I think cameras instead of windows are fine. We have the technology so we should take advantage of it. The only issue I see is that with only a forward vision camera the pilot would lose some situational awareness. I understand that a pilot could rely solely on instruments to fly, but having side views would be helpful IMO. Maybe the plane will incorporate side view cameras as well. Dave I might be wrong, but I think it has side windows, Dave. Small ones, so as you say, not optimal situational awareness.
January 14, 20242 yr 48 minutes ago, dave2013 said: I understand that a pilot could rely solely on instruments to fly, but having side views would be helpful IMO. Maybe the plane will incorporate side view cameras as well. 35 minutes ago, martin-w said: I might be wrong, but I think it has side windows, Dave. Small ones, so as you say, not optimal situational awareness. “I’ve continued to get more and more comfortable with the XVS through flight tests and our [X-59] flight simulators,” said Nils Larson, NASA X-59 test pilot. Though an unlikely scenario, Larson said that “I can even land the airplane with the XVS turned off” by relying on his vision through the aircraft’s canopy, side windows, and data provided by the X-59’s avionics should the XVS malfunction. ...even though the view through the side windows seems to be partly blocked by the canards: Edited January 14, 20242 yr by dmwalker Dugald Walker
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.