January 29Jan 29 Here in Portugal we Love MEL, FSL has MEL, we love FSL 🙂 But Fenix is not behind... They're pretty on pair to me, someone who never flew a real 320, but had the chance to try the CAE sim for a whole hour 🙂 Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 29Jan 29 FENIX FOR SURE, FS LABS planes are not designed well visually look odd etc (I did a video on it) and sounds are poor.... FENIX looks flies and sounds perfect! done. And they just "work" like PMDG does, dependable... no issues. No framerate issues.
January 29Jan 29 Commercial Member For some reason with the Fenix I always seem to end up to the right of the runway while on approach no matter what the winds are doing. I don't experience that in any other aircraft on either sim, does anyone else experience this? (Hand-flying, not autopilot - autoland works perfectly). Edited January 29Jan 29 by FPVSteve Developer of Self-Loading Cargo - The Cabin Crew and Passenger Simulation Addon for MSFS, X-Plane, P3D and FSX
June 20Jun 20 On 12/22/2025 at 2:53 PM, jlund said:What is the "Mel" that FSL apparently has and that Fenix doesn't?And how does the FBW A320 compare system wise to Fenix and FSlabs?Sorry to bump but a really good example of an MEL is this one ive got this morningwhich the engineers have tried to fix but failed, hence why the MEL is there Edited June 20Jun 20 by fluffyflops
Create an account or sign in to comment