Hello all,

We are currently gathering structured user feedback for BeyondATC and would greatly appreciate input from the community.

To support this, we have expanded our Pilot Portal with a survey aimed at better understanding user workflows, simulator habits, and feature priorities. This information will directly inform our development roadmap moving forward.

You can access the survey here with your BeyondATC account:
https://db.beyondatc.net/forms/cefd4b9b0d58b259

Please note:

- Access requires a valid BeyondATC account and license

- The survey includes both usage patterns of the simulator and feature-focused questions

- We encourage you to share this with other BeyondATC users you may know

The survey will remain open until the end of the month.

Thank you to everyone who contributes, we really appreciate the support and feedback!

Absolutely!

Done.

Edited May 2May 2 by CFIJose

Done!

BTW - there's a bug in the "Which flight simulators have you used in 2026?" section. It wouldn't allow me to enter "DCS" in the "Other" section on final submission.

 

Filled out.  Seems it wouldn't let me select Other type of approach I've flown.  I tried to type in "Contact Approach" without success.

PAR would be a lot of fun.  Let's test those vectors 😉.  

I can't finish the questionnaire. After the seventh page, an error message appears saying that the page couldn't be loaded, and it jumps back to the first page.

I think the questionnaire is an "early access" beta ... LOL!

6 hours ago, Stearmandriver said:

PAR would be a lot of fun.  Let's test those vectors 😉.  

Is that in use somewhere for regular civilian traffic?

I hope you will give us some results, when the survey is done. 🙂

9 hours ago, ryanbatc said:

Filled out.  Seems it wouldn't let me select Other type of approach I've flown.  I tried to type in "Contact Approach" without success.

Thanks for highlighting the issue, it’s been fixed. You can edit your answer if you want 🙂

2 hours ago, mrueedi said:

Is that in use somewhere for regular civilian traffic?

Quite a few military fields will still offer them to civilian traffic for controller proficiency's sake.  Practice approaches will result in a miss, but naturally in an emergency situation where the civilian aircraft needs the PAR, it's a useful backup to have in your area; it'll get you on the ground safely.

8 hours ago, Stearmandriver said:

PAR would be a lot of fun.  Let's test those vectors 😉.  

I believe PAR is given by dod controllers but I have given numerous ASR approaches....it's basically like a PAR but without vertical guidance.  (However there are suggested altitude given by atc).  I've also flown a few myself.  The toughest ones I've provided are when flight check was doing it - they'd always tell you how you did lol!

Haha right, keeping you honest!  😁

(To be clear, it was a joke - I don't expect BATC to be able to conduct PARs lol).