Alti

Hi, the comment about the holding pattern was meant more as a joke: I’m flying the B73x and waiting for clearance to receive the Tool. However, the clearance isn’t coming through, so off to the holding pattern I go. My virtual passengers can’t cope with as many right turns as the time spent in holding already takes, so they’re already asking for a left turn. The best thing would be the approach to make the purchase decision to get off from the Holding. But that’s still pending, so I’m in holding. I hope you’ve now got the joke behind it a bit better. :-)

@anilcougar The price list on your website states: Basic: including ‘Free updates for v1.x’ Does that mean that if version 2 is released, you have to buy it again?

that is what you can see now: Edit: sorry , i have tryed some links, the pic will not shown in the new forum.

I'm using the experimental version of BATC and am currently flying around China. They've finally taught the ATC that in China, altitudes are given in metres. It works. well done BATC!

If you were to release a video showing how passengers react to turbulence or rough landings; or if wecould hear the toilet doors opening and closing behind the cockpit; or if you could hear a baby crying during the climb, then I’d be willing to buy it. The video and Pictutres on your Website currently available don’t show anything that other programmes can’t already do.

I can't finish the questionnaire. After the seventh page, an error message appears saying that the page couldn't be loaded, and it jumps back to the first page.

I reckon a new, modern CPU, a fast motherboard and 64GB of RAM on top of that won’t cost all that much. My RTX 5080 will last a long time yet; by then, other headsets will have come out. Technology is advancing. I prefer a wide field of view, which is why the Ultra is my choice. I also wear glasses, so I’ll never be able to fit my glasses under a ‘DreamAir’. And prescription contact lenses? No, thank you – then my friends wouldn’t be able to wear the headset. But there’s no rush. I don’t feel pressured to make any hasty decisions right now. Still, thanks for your input.

Thanks for that. That’s more or less what I thought. Gemini gave it a similar rating. I’ll carry on using my Quest 3. In the hope that PC components will become more affordable again in the future, I’ll build myself a new top-of-the-range machine that can handle a good VR headset.

Hello everyone! I’m not sure if my PC is suitable for a “Pimax Crystal Super with ULTRAWIDE” module. My PC has the following specifications: Intel i9-900K CPU; 32 GB RAM; MSI RTX 5080. Google’s Geimini suggests that my CPU won’t meet the requirements to fly smoothly in MSFS2024 and enjoy the full resolution. So far, I’ve been running the flight simulator with Quest3 and a Samsung HMD. What do you think? Will i get happy with Crystal Super Ultrawide on my PC?

You can export your Simbriefplan into a *.pln - file with the "SimbriefDownloader". export your plan into the PMDG Flightplan folder. And import it in the FMS via "CompanyRoute". So i did not have any WASM Crash with Simbrief Flightplans. Most "Real Pilots" ALWAYS type the plan into FMS manualy.

I need to correct myself: I don’t use Chaseplane to switch between camera views; I use FLOW. And yes, the views in question, which are faulty, are fixed. You can’t move around within the view.

To be honest, I don’t really care about any of these views. I very rarely use an exterior view, and cabin views even less so. 99 per cent of the time, I only switch between cockpit views. After all, I’m the pilot, not a passenger. I never really use the cabin views. I’ve only looked through the views that are suggested to see if I experience the same ‘glitch’ as longhaul747. and yes, i see the same ugly view.

I’ve loaded some of these presets. They’re faulty. For instance, the sun was illuminating the ground and the clouds, which looked beautiful in terms of colour, but the aeroplane remained in shadow even though it was thousands of feet above the clouds. So I won’t be using these presets again.

yes i cant move. Chaseplane describes the affected views as ‘showcase’ views, which I cannot change. I can move all the other views. Has PMDG perhaps set this camera view (two views in my case) with incorrect coordinates? The other showcase views are fine.

î see absolute the same in the left and in the right view. the camera is fixed, i can not move in this view...

why should WE need more 747? i am happy with all 737 in FS2024 and do not need any 747 in the 737 topic.

I’ve also experienced several WASM crashes with the PMDG 737 aircraft in MSFS 2024. PMDG seems to have an issue with imported Simbrief flight plans. (That’s just my opinion; I’ve posted about it on their forum). So I use the Simbrief Downloader to export complex flight plans locally to the flight plan folder, and then load them into the FMC. I enter short flight plans manually. Since I’ve been doing it this way, I haven’t had a single WASM crash with a 737 in MSFS2024.

Testflight was good. No troubles here with RTX3080Ti. Well done, PMDG! it is a good 737-700.

Did you perhaps adjust the clock in the 737? In the P3D version, there was a function that allowed you to change the sim rate on the clock. The time and rate were then displayed in yellow. Perhaps this function is also included in MSFS2024?

doublepost...

sorry double...

Question: What does the programm mean by a “good landing”? A comfortable landing rate, perhaps? Surely we should know that, for the sake of a safe landing, it is sometimes essential to touch down a bit harder so that the wheels immediately grip the runway, for example in very wet conditions. If the programme assesses this as incorrectly as all other programmes of this kind, then it is actually worthless.

Thank you for answer. so my Windows or GSX did not what you describe. I switch in Windows ALL Sound-Outputs from "Lautsprecher" (Speaker) to "Headset". So all output sounds from the Cockpit goes to the Headset, but the communication from outside (Ramp Agent) stays on "Lautsprecher" (Speaker). so im must manual set the right setting from standard away to get the output sound from Lautsprecher to the Headset. When i set in Windows all standard output devices from Headset to Lausprecher (Speakers) then again only the ramp agent output Sounds stays in the Headset. in my Opinion this ist wrong? The output Sound from the Ramp should also automatc goes to the standard output sounds like in windows. so its an output, not an input sound. That’s probably a different way of looking at it; we’ve heard about what counts as output and what counts as input, haven’t we?

@virtuali there is anything not correct with "default" Devices in GSX. Windows shows me ONE Default Setting: it is "Lautsprecher" GSX shows me now two default settings. there should be only ONE default setting, like them from Windows? so i have in the Audio Options from GSX this one: Comms: * Default - Realtek HD Audio 2nd output Cockpit: * Default - Realtek HD Audio 2nd output Outside: * Default - Lautsprecher. So change Windows-Sound-Setting did not change GSX-Sound settings. its the same trouble like before.

Yes Sir. i knew. On a screen 49" with a resolution of 3840x1080, i have to zoom out quite a bit to get an overview of the cockpit without having to constantly pan the camera. That’s why there’s a problem with the small fonts. You can’t make them big enough for me to read them properly. That’s why these two aircraft are staying in my hangar.