btw..."likes of people that flew B-17s and Liberators over Germany in World War 2 and Skyraiders over Vietnam and who crewed merchant shipping in an Atlantic infested with ###### U-boats that have given people the liberty to hold differing opinion and not the act of writing as a techie in a flightsim internet forum. As for Direcx 10, I am still waiting for evidence that Directx 10 graphics are in any way significantly better than Directx 9 graphics."WW II had nothing to do with FSX. ######, Japanese, Italian, NOBODY had anything to do with FSX. FSX has problems, yes. FSX Fascist and a nuisance...no.My 2 cents,bt

>btw..."likes of people that flew B-17s and Liberators over>Germany in World War 2 and Skyraiders over Vietnam and who>crewed merchant shipping in an Atlantic infested with ######>U-boats that have given people the liberty to hold differing>opinion and not the act of writing as a techie in a flightsim>internet forum. As for Direcx 10, I am still waiting for>evidence that Directx 10 graphics are in any way significantly>better than Directx 9 graphics.">>WW II had nothing to do with FSX. ######, Japanese, Italian,>NOBODY had anything to do with FSX. >>FSX has problems, yes. FSX Fascist and a nuisance...no.>>My 2 cents,>>bt>Where did I suggest that FSX was something to do with Fascism? Though in fairness to you, whilst I did not state that FSX was a Nuisance, that is pretty much my opinion of it, as something which one pays fifty plus US dollars for, is stated as haveing a system requirement of a 1 Ghz processor, a 32 mb Graphics card and a 15 GB hard-drive and out of the box crawls along at low frame rates in built up areas on a overclocked AMD Athlon 64 dual core 4800 with 1 + 1 megabyte cache and four hard-drives runing in raid 0+1 and a pair of pre overclocked Gainward 7600GT Golden sample video cards on a Asus A8N-SLI deluxe motherboard with 4 Gigabytes of RAM in Windows XP 64 Professional is pretty much my idea of a nuisance. With Best and Warm RegardsAdrian Wainer

I have to agree here. Expectations were very high for FSX and look what happened...Now whether or not those expectations were realistic and who is responsible for setting those expectations so high is another matter, but let's not get carried away (again). The proof, as they say is in the pudding!I read a review the other day by Andrew Herd on Flightsim.com - it was for an FS9 product, and Mr Herd stated that the reason why the market for FS9 products is so strong is because FSX has been a "problem child". That for me sums it up perfectly.

Joey,Please get your SIG within posting rules... 1.) Only one (1) image is allowed2.) That image shall not be larger than 400 x 60 pixels in size3.) The image file shall not be larger than 10 Kbytes in size4.) The image can be animated, but shall not exceed the 10 Kbytes sizeYou can use text in your signature, but the use of any image shall adhere to the above. Thank you for your co-operation.