Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Neutral

About N_matus

  • Birthday 08/29/1990

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Santiago, Chile
  • Interests
    Star Wars, Airplanes, and Gaming!

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You need it to exclude the default P3Dv5 buildings. So keep that file.
  2. Disable the original one (KSMF_ADEX_SMF. bgl) by changing the ending from *.bgl into *.off. Let my know if it worked for you. It did for me 🙂
  3. Yep, but note that those w/o the Orbx NCA have had elevation issues since P3Dv4. Neither Vector's AEC nor default elevation is correct to the scenery one. This was my case and it works fine on both v4 and v5 🙂
  4. Hi Pete! Use the file suggested on this post on the Aerosoft Forums. Dont forget to turn off the original BGL. https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/148114-sacramento-p3d/ Best Nico
  5. Just tried this! Works like a charm. Thanks for the heads up!
  6. I am eager to see what's next with MSFS (should I call it like that?). Specially, I want to know if Microsoft will allow developers to create addons without the hassle or restrictions of a closed source software. What raised my left eyebrow though, was the part of the A320neo, specially the cockpit. I noted on the ECAM EWD, that the "NW STRG DISC" - "TCAS STBY" and "APU BLEED" were displayed. Now, that's something I wouldn't expect from a default sim aircraft, but rather from an addon. And the cockpit looks very very very similar to the Aerosoft's A320. Somebody mentioned a couple of pages back that this might be the secret proyect they were working on? I don't know. These are great times for flight simmers. Lots of options to choose right now!
  7. Same one from last version, just run the installer and will do the trick. I've just downloaded both. Access to the page and getting the link is slow as pluto orbiting around the sun. Downloading is fast as a thunder.
  8. Good to know that you can read now 🙂. I agree. Before update 232, the FSLabs VC displays where crispy like the FFA320. But it seems that they downgraded the resolution for performance issues. Nevertheless, systemwise is far better!
  9. Hey Chris! What AA Setting do you have? Is FXAA enabled? Usually when I enable FXAA i get exactly the same results as yours. I only use 4x SSAA and this is how the VC looks on the bus on my system. FSL A319X Cheers
  10. Independently of the "testing method" I'm glad that Luis found a solution! We chatted a little bit some time ago about this and despite the inputs I gave him, we couldn't figure a solution. On the other hand, I was very happy with v4.3 , and even more happier with v4.4. Work like butter for me! Cheers, Nico
  11. I am IMPRESSED! They kept it under secret! I work at this airport, I am a local who for years has needed un update! Includes the new terminal in construction! Thanks for the excellent job LatinVFR! https://secure.simmarket.com/latinvfr-santiago-scelv2-p3dv4.phtml?fbclid=IwAR1UWjxGUB37v6vtkoUdbDZxMbuXm6lO9hSHmoMzahCNBpsdE8hYio527LQ http://www.latinvfr.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=26 Saludos!
  12. I've installed it and tested it on KZSE ARTCC's FNO, almost 100 aircraft. Definitely the best AI package for VATSIM out there. Great job BVAI!
  13. Same problem here. Had .231 installed. Works like a charm! I'm not interested on the changes suggested by the popup menu but keeps appearing!
  • Create New...