duggy35

What's the most obvious difference (performance or visual) between FSX and P3D with the 777? Steve McLaren

It's alright dude. Vote with your wallet. Worked for me! Steve McLaren

Very well. Since free speech is no longer a part of the 'Western World', I shall provide feedback with my wallet........and leave it firmly shut. Nice plane though. Cheers Steve McLaren

Gents- And in other news- we may finally have the 777 for P3D into final testing by this time next week... <phew> Grain of salt....taken. Gulp Great job guys. This will be a huge moment for the flight simming community Steve McLaren

My wallet is ready for the holiday sale should the button version be released. Just saying Steve Mac

"1) We anticipate the PMDG 777-200LR/F for P3D and the PMDG 777-300ER for P3D being released before year end." At the risk of repeating myself: bwaa...no I won't or I might be punished. Such a sad situation for the average simmer that does the right thing. Those of us that are P3D academic/PMDG home users are struggling to come to terms with the licencing issues as PMDG ventures into Prepar3d (or not). I doubt this will impact your customer base but I predict an increase in licence violations. Just saying. You can't blame people for loving the T7. Please persist Robert. The PMDG legacy should continue and that means P3D. In the meantime, FSX lives!! Steve McLaren

D'oh! Not again Steve McLaren

Touchy subject round here. Best not to ask If you've time, browse this forum re radar. Hilarious

Mmmm.........Bwaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhaaaaaaahhhhh....ROFL I literally fell on the ground laughing Seriously though. I love you guys and your addons are worth the wait no matter how long. Flight simming wouldn't be the same without PMDG. The thought of the 737 NGX in P3D keeps me up at night. I'll buy anything you release for P3D. Cheers Steve Mac

Exactly. Seems to be some potential customers out there for a button version. Very disappointed I must say. Great product otherwise. Build it and they will come?

Who denies climate? I'm not denying global warming, or that CO2 plays a part, just the catastrophic alarmism that keeps the funds flowing and the degradation of science. They certainly aren't but they have the most profound influence. Now that 'the cause' has become a moral issue where to deny the 'consensus' is a sin, there's no way media outlets are going to back pedal and say "hey, maybe we over-reacted a bit. You were right, we were wrong. Sorry about the economy. Can I keep my job?" That one word in the context of climate science with respect to warming is enough to conjure billions in funding and drive global fiscal policy. Scary Sorry, mate. Can't help myself when the global warming religion nuts pipe up. He's just regurgitating the 'blog' site mate and the almighty IPCC Now, back to flying digitally! Amen

No one's denying that CO2 is a greenhouse gas What have right-wing organisations got to do with anything? It's supposed to be science isn't it? Straight from fearless, self-proclaimed, low-carbon footprint (NOT) leader himself, Mr Gore and his ridiculous propaganda film.

Wow. You're link at the bottom says it all (speaking of vested interests). That propaganda site is not top of the tree when it comes to unbiased, impartial and factual climate information. That consensus argument was dead the moment it was uttered. Consensus as a means of scientific argument is bogus. John Cook's ridiculous paper has been torn to shreds a thousand times over. 'empirical observations'? Climate models are not evidence. Models are only as good as the dodgy data that goes into them and any parameter can be tweaked to produce the desired outcome. Do yourself a favour and get away from the blog sites and discover the truth behind the CO2 scapegoat

quote name='martin-w' timestamp='1390824776' post='2915294'] I'm assuming you are anti-MMGW? Do you work for the government? Or a greenie organisation? You have the mantra right. I'm a realist, which means I believe in looking at the data myself and not believing what those with vested interests want us to believe. We (humans) are having an effect certainly but the man-made signal is so miniscule as to be not discernible from natural variation. Climate sensitivity to CO2 remains unproven. Current GLOBAL temperature is stagnant and that's even after 'data adjustment' by government-funded organisations like CRU, GISS, NOAA and BOM. In the meantime CO2 has increased exponentially. The tenuous link between CO2 increase and global temperature remains just a theory. Don't just regurgitate the memes laid down by the prophets Gore, Mann et al. Of that 3% attributable to CO2, man's contribution to that CO2 is less than 10% of it. Most people's interpretation of extreme weather events is from the shortsighted/forgetful (wilful ignorance?) Mainstream Media, which has its own interests in keeping the AGW story alive. Extreme weather events are not on the increase. That 'might or might not be' has cost billions globally, and destroyed economies (most notably Europe which is abandoning the AGW, lefty/Greenie movement) but what do we have to show for it? A steadily increasing CO2 level and no temperature rise.

The narrow-minded BOM here in Oz continues to adjust the temperature record by cooling the past and warming the present. Summer in Oz is hot, has been hot and will be hot. The greenhouse effect is real, the result of water vapour (95%), CO2 (3%) and other gases. The world is slowly becoming aware of the reality and the damage done by the lefty greenies (measured in billions of dollars). Things are a-changin'. Next time you hear "record" or "unprecedented" do some research to see past the b.s. Makes it interesting flying a heavy 737 into and out of Alice Springs (YBAS) on a 46 deg day

When you're married though, even if you bought the 777 every day that's still true Steve Mac

I'm not finished with the NGX yet. And I just received delivery of the fantastic Majestic Q400. So I'm ok if they take their time...... (Got in trouble from Tabs for gettng impatient with the NGX so I won't let on my prediction

Sadly, that seems to rule out 2011 :( See ya next year PMDG. I'm gonna be strong and not check this forum any more (constant negativity anyway) - gotta fight the urge to chime in and add to all the crud being written.Looking forward to the greatest flight sim add on thus far.Good luck Ryan, Robert, Vin & co.Steve McLaren

Whoah! I just had a massive deja vu!Steve McLaren

Oh oh.........Steve McLaren

"One possible reason for the delay"To say there's a delay is to suggest that PMDG has a release schedule for the NGX.I don't think there is one.Let them finish itSteve McLaren

You talking negative or positive about PMDG or NGX?A come on this a real nightmare :(If you were even a little familiar with this forum you'd know that this project has been subject to continual extensions in its development time. It's far from a nightmare. We'll get it soon enough.The real joke is some people's reaction to not getting their new 'toy'. It's just a Flight Sim add-on and hardly worth getting angry or abusive over.I don't mind having a little dig at PMDG when their own predictions about the NGX's development time don't come true but honestly I don't care if it takes a little longer, only that it blows the other developers out of the water when it is eventually released.Steve McLaren

Oh, but it is true! Are you at all familiar with PMDG or the NGX?Steve McLaren

and..............................................?Steve McLaren

So soon?Surely the fingerprints and dust need more work!Steve McLaren