g_precentralis

Not having proper simulated flight controls in 2013 was unacceptable, yet we waited 1 year for fix at the well known, $100 priced, product. Some would argue that lack of 2d panels is unacceptable for $100 priced product, but I guess some developers are to blame and some others not...

maybe, maybe not, depends what technique is used for texturing.

No, you do not have to alter 3d model. You can just fill the windows with paint, and remove alpha channel, and you have perfectly fine cargo converted 747 like this: http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/uploaded-images/2010-8/22/99385.jpg (god knows how much I'm resisting buying it right now, while I'm looking at the photo) Of course, you cannot add new cargo door, but it's not a big deal.

Well, you can descend with great rate with full flaps if you need that, but I wouldn't do that in final approach.

Ouch, I'm really sorry, didn't see the topic is in X-plane forum. Well, Carenado and Alabeo produces for X-plane, I think that would be the best you can find, although I do not like their aircraft for FSX.

Try some of A2A or RealAir product. That should be the highest quality GA developers.

What new website, I can see only the old one?

You can bake every PCB if you suspect problem is with cold solder joint. If problem is something else, baking will probably not help.

That's SAARU supplying attitude, air data and heading (manually set) when ADIRU fails (or is turned off). Absolutely normal behavior.

It's worth of try. I baked few broken graphic cards (fortunately, not mine), sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Just do not forget to remove plastic cover and fan .

That's from edetroit private collection, not on market.

:ph34r: I'm not sure how I came up with this number it's about 19hpa difference, not 33.

There is a thread already. Anyway, there is of course risk whenever you update firmware, but it's minimal. Even if you loose data, SSD should be operation device, not data storage device, so worst case would be reinstallation of windows and software. All 840EVO devices are affected, you can notice it if you pay attention.

500ft change would be about 33hpa difference. It's not possible to have such a change instantly. It's highly unlikely to have such a change even within few hours. For a reference, today in Europe, there is 44hpa difference, between cyclone and anticyclone, but it's spread over 1500nm with gradual change. It's not normal, and it's probably due wrong wx data imported in FSX

That option is really useful to me when I want to test something, and repeat it multiple times. Restarting FSX after every test scenario is not an option. But, it's not about what I'm trying to accomplish, because the option exists and it's not instructed that I cannot use it in the way I described. Also, it works in that way in NGX, so why wouldn't in T7? I'll quote introduction manual: It's obvious that the panel state load function doesn't work as described.