HighTech

I use 3 monitors and never come back to a monitor, the immersion we have is good too. Few people have because of the high cost and difficult setup. In your case, 6 monitors is very much but if you want to give the most support, but you need to invest a lot in Hardware and also knowledge of Windows. In my case I get average 30 to 39 FPS with my old Phenom 970 and over the GPU HD 7970 with graphics at + - 60 to 70% Full. But to get at it without crash problems, OOM, etc ... invested in much knowledge of FSX and Windows. I have a Triple Boot with 4 HDS of 2TBs and three Windows in each one, and I leave a Windows only for FSX and no other game, just not to give conflicts. In the other HDs you have another copy of FSX for testing only, as I do not install anything on my main FSX before testing on FSX Cobaia. I have other 6 HDs for Backup, because I always do Full Backup of the image of each HD, because any problems I have how to recover without needing to reinstall anything. I use a good Firewall along with an Antivirus. It was with these procedures that I have my FSX for 4 years without needing to reinstall and with more than 1500 scenario entries and no problems. If you want a FSX or even a good Prepar3D, I suggest starting by leaving Windows only for a Simulator and not installing any other game or program other than for simulators.

The OLC_SA_LIGHTS folder results in drastic dropping of FPS in some locales, I was annoyed with this even because I bought the openLC NA I also noticed that it came back that old problem of the Orbx lights dropping the same day FPS, where we had to disable using two files. As a palliative solution, disabling this "OLC_SA_LIGHTS" folder that does not cause problems only decreases the amount and intensity of night illumination. A pity, it was beautiful at night, but losing almost + - 20 FPS can not bear. Does anyone have any tips or do you have this problem too?

Michal Trzesniowski Muito Obrigado, reinstalando o DirectX, todos os sons voltaram a funcionar, Agradeço muito

Hello Fppilot, I understand your question, but I'm not saying that the product is bad, but that need corrections because look beautiful landscapes and more real, like other reviewers here too seek. There is much difference in color and many lines separating the states. I do not remember flying see the top lines separating states. If MegaSceneryEarth give more value to mountainous regions, you can be sure that I will be a customer of them. As already said, "Ultra-Res National Parks - Olympic Mountains" was great, because it is not so close to the mainland, there is a good portion of the ocean between the mountains not giving the color difference printing, resulting in a more realistic appearance. Of course, every suggestion and criticism and welcome and appreciate your opinion.

Me too still use the older packages of SoCal, Phoenix, Florida, and Las Vegas today. and I did not have this color difference so big. Take a look at Google earth, there is this huge difference in colors, so believe it way rather than better. At least they could take the lines of boundaries that are so visible.

Beerwolfe, You're right, until we resolve this, do not buy any more state. The only worthwhile at the moment and bought and look great is the "Ultra-Res National Parks - Olympic Mountains." Because it is a mountainous area, the lack of night texture does so much.Already I asked them to do only some mountainous regions, Cordillera of the Andes and Himalayas kind and leave the smoother Photoreal the outline of the scene and not one bunch of squares in different colors. Dogtrack, accurate, the price is cheap, but even in Europe have differences of colors and will be difficult to compete also with Orbx EUROPE. So I say, what they save and fazeram the Photoreal only the most mountainous regions of Europe.

Look at the picture attached, there is a serious failure of transition from one state to another, between New Mexico and Colorado. There can be no lines separating one state from another. The color is also very different, had to be like that, like the images of GoogleEarth. So it is strange flying the US. I am still awaiting the PCaviator for this correction, since bought many states and all are different colors and lines separating from one another. The states with ultra-resolution are also not well, see the color difference in the attached pictures. I keep buying, but need to solve this and leave a color pattern and no lines.

Guys, I'm trying to solve this problem without success, to see in the figure that the top is normal Zoom in on my Eyefinity but what is below, see I can not even see the runway, already tried everything and zoom does not decrease, and 0.30 as is the default and only increases not decrease further. In normal mode on one monitor is right, but when I put in 3, is like this. If anyone can give a help to decrease as the field of view, thank you very much. Remember that in other games this does not happen then it can only be some setting in FSX.

Mr. Styckx note 10, paid more attention in your solution and solved everything, I do not know how to thank you. Hugs ...

I think I'm having the same problem but can not find this option in the catalyst, the mine is 12.10. See the images attached to the outline of objects in the image are bad 1 being the sapphire 6950 and VGA in image 2 are good MSI's VGA 6870. How to solve the 6950 VGA? From already thank you.